Don't require forward_labels for `kata-containers/kata-containers` repo nor for PRs targettng the `main` branch of the `kata-containers/tests` repo

[fidencio]

Don't require forward_labels for `kata-containers/kata-containers` repo nor for PRs targettng the `main` branch of the `kata-containers/tests` repo

[fidencio]

• kata-containers/kata-containers case:

  • Please, take a look at

    .github/scripts/pr-porting-checks.sh

    Line 76 in 376459c

    local forward_port_labels=("needs-forward-port" "no-forward-port-needed" "forward-port")

    ... there we can check for the repo and only set the forward-port labels accordingly;

• kata-containers/tests case:

  • Similar to what was suggested above, but I'd also start passing to the script (please, see: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/blob/aac852a0bc34fb61948c8f4ceb885ef8ea5b1de9/.github/workflows/require-pr-porting-labels.yaml#L51) the target branch

@jodh-intel, what do you think?

[fidencio]

/cc @dgibson, as you've complained about this in the past.

[dgibson]

Right, this is essentially a dupe of kata-containers/tests#3180 but covering different repos.

[c3d]

We'd like to remove the need-review flag, but no can't do, no access. @kata-containers/action-admins, could I have access rights for this repo?

[jodh-intel]

@c3d - I've given the kata-containers group admin rights on this repo, which seems reasonable 😄

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

[stale]

This issue/pull request has been automatically closed due to inactivity and no response to the auto close bot request. If you feel this is inappropriate, please respond to this issue requesting it to be re-opened.