Support/logic for supporting ETH + ERC20 tokens

[kleros]

Support/logic for supporting ETH + ERC20 tokens

[epiqueras]

Why is currency a prop instead of defaulting to ETH and having a prop token for custom addresses?

[satello]

You can do it this way. You need the ticker as well for display, but you can have token = {ticker, address}

[epiqueras]

You can get the ticker from the token contract.

[satello]

Not always. It is an optional field so I think it is better to have it passed. We also we need to be careful because you can't use any token -- it needs to be ERC20. So if someone uses the widget with a different token the buyers payment will be stuck in the contract. This was my original thinking when I planned to integrate the T2CR.

[epiqueras]

Ahh, ok.

So if someone uses the widget with a different token the buyers payment will be stuck in the contract.

How is that related to the ticker thing?

[satello]

It's related because its part of the decision to not use the T2CR. One option that I was planning on going with is to have them just pass the ticker and look up the contract address in the T2CR (and throw an error if a ticker passed doesn't have the ERC20 badge). The other option we have discussed here is to have the integrator pass the ticker and address

[epiqueras]

Can't multiple tokens have the same ticker?