Firefox extensions

[koba04]

Firefox extensions

[koba04]

@jellydn
Yeah, I know vite gives us great DX.
However, I prefer discussing it as another issue because I think using webextension-polyfill is relevant to this issue but using vite is not.

[jellydn]

Agreed. Thanks. Let me try to draft a PR about it.

[jellydn]

Hi @koba04 Let me know if you have any feedback on the PR. Thanks.

[koba04]

I've published SWRDevTools into the Mozilla's developer hub and am waiting for the review.

[koba04]

@jellydn SWRDevTools has been published as a Firefox extension 🚀 🚀 🚀 Thanks @jellydn for your great work!!
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/swr-devtools/

[jellydn]

Hi @koba04

Do you have any plan for working on this item yet? If not, I would take a try to implement this one. My plan is using this one https://github.com/antfu/vitesse-webext Thanks.

[koba04]

@jellydn Thank you! I don't have any plan for this yet. I have a question. vitesse-webext seems to be a starter template for WebExtension and includes full-stack features for WebExtension. Why do we have to use vitesse-webext to support Firefox?

[jellydn]

Hi @koba04 It's more than a personal choice when I am comparing 'webpack' vs 'vitejs'. Have you tried 'ViteJs' before? I really like their DX. That's why I would suggest the starter.

[jellydn]

The main logic is using https://github.com/mozilla/webextension-polyfill and replaces 'chrome.' with 'browser.' I think.