Same Filename handling

[mawosch]

Same Filename handling

[kristofg]

Hm, yeah, that's true. I've set all my cameras to use sequential file names (ie. don't reset the counter when the card is emptied), so all my .1 files tend to be duplicates. I haven't really considered the use case where you want to keep both versions.

I'm a bit sceptical of messing about "inside" the file names; a trailing .1 is easy to identify and remove. foo123.jpg -> foo123-A.jpg / foo123-1.jpg / foo123+1.jpg can be much harder to identify unambigously (depending on the camera naming scheme, of course). But that may be too much paranoia. I'll have to think about it for a bit.

To solve your immediate problem, the sprintf() call in RIFEC::File::_link_file() would be the place to look. For your use case, I'm guessing you could change the single sprintf() to something like this (Note: this code is NOT TESTED):

my ($base, $ending) = split /\./, $destination_name, 2;
my $newbase = sprintf("%s+%d", $base, ++$tries);
$dst = join('.', $newbase, $ending);