Analysis and Compliance Strategy for New Cyber Resilience Act

[camilamacedo86]

Analysis and Compliance Strategy for New Cyber Resilience Act

[varshaprasad96]

Hi @camilamacedo86, thanks for brining this to attention. I took a dig at the Cyber Resilience Act and some of the implications it may have. A few thoughts on this:

1. Looks like the CRA is in the draft stage, and the current specifications are based on the initial draft published in September. The Act, if passed by EU would take effect in 2024 (end) - 2025: https://www.fmapprovals.com/product-alerts-and-news-events/Insights/eu-cyber-resilience-act
2. Kubebuilder - should be coming under non-critical project based on the criteria they have mentioned - but it would be nice if we can wait for the steps k8s takes as a whole. I hope there would be some guidance from their end.
3. Based on the article - looks like we fall in the second category (as specified under "Are you covered by the CRA?" section) - where we follow a de-centralized community driven model, where not just one company develops the software. Some of the requirements may probably change for us, given we can't explicitly evaluate how/where our consumers use the product. We may probably have to wait out to see how things turn out before taking an action.

[everettraven]

I also took a look at the shared article and I 100% agree with the breakdown @varshaprasad96 shared. My inclination is that we would be classified as a non-critical project based (since we are a dev tool for streamlining the building of software) on the information provided. I agree with waiting for more guidance from the Kubernetes orgs or CNCF as a whole before making any commitments.

[camilamacedo86]

@varshaprasad96 @Kavinjsir @everettraven @rashmigottipati