find -size <number-without-suffix> not POSIX

[stephane-chazelas]

find -size not POSIX

from toybox.

[stephane-chazelas]

There's a similar problem with the -Xtime [-+]<n> predicates, there the <n> is not treated as an integer number of days and more like the -Xtime [-+]<n>d of FreeBSD.

For instance -mtime 0 is meant to reports files last modified in the last 24 hours, while toybox find only reports the ones last modified exactly now.

[landley]

Busybox having behaved this way 2007 and nobody noticed seem that strong an argument. Do you have a use case that broke because of this?

512 seems irrelevant (minimum block size of ext2 was 1024 back in the 1990s, even fat32 defaults to at least 4k these days). If we gave m units presumably it should round to the megabyte?

[landley]

Sharp edge here is that -size has any supplied units override the default (including c=bytes), but -time and -min don't (1kd days is 1000 days).

[landley]

Debian's find -size also implicitly selects -type f.

[stephane-chazelas]

Debian's find -size also implicitly selects -type f.

Why would it do that?

$ find . -size 5542c -prune -ls
      258      0 drwxr-xr-x   1 chazelas chazelas     5542 Apr 25 19:29 .
$ find /etc/mtab -size 19c -prune -ls
   187446      4 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           19 Jun 27  2021 /etc/mtab -> ../proc/self/mounts
$ find --version
find (GNU findutils) 4.9.0
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Written by Eric B. Decker, James Youngman, and Kevin Dalley.
Features enabled: D_TYPE O_NOFOLLOW(enabled) LEAF_OPTIMISATION FTS(FTS_CWDFD) CBO(level=2)
$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Debian
Description:    Debian GNU/Linux trixie/sid
Release:        n/a
Codename:       trixie

[stephane-chazelas]

Busybox having behaved this way 2007 and nobody noticed seem that strong an argument. Do you have a use case that broke because of this?

512 seems irrelevant (minimum block size of ext2 was 1024 back in the 1990s, even fat32 defaults to at least 4k these days). If we gave m units presumably it should round to the megabyte?

It's quite well known busybox is not standard compliant and that one needs to adapt their script when porting to busybox.

Common denominator for block device block size is still 512 bytes.

But that's hardly relevant (and not the point of this question).

Find's -size <number-without-suffix> is a well known almost 50 years old API which checks the size based on number of 512 byte units. If you want your tool to use different unit, don't call it find or use a separate API that doesn't break backward compatibility like the find -size 12k of FreeBSD or GNU (incompatible between themselves), or introduce a new one and convince other implementations to adopt it so it can be suggested as a standard to POSIX and used portably in a few decades.

[terefang]

But that's hardly relevant (and not the point of this question).

Find's -size <number-without-suffix> is a well known almost 50 years old API which checks the size based on number of 512 byte units. If you want your tool to use different unit, don't call it find or use a separate API that doesn't break backward compatibility like the find -size 12k of FreeBSD or GNU (incompatible between themselves), or introduce a new one and convince other implementations to adopt it so it can be suggested as a standard to POSIX and used portably in a few decades.

@stephane-chazelas while you have a point that there is deviation from the POSIX standard here, toybox is only claiming reasonably standards-compliant and possible more inclined to follow busybox compatiblity here.

also the POSIX standard is imprecise, vague or outright lacking in many places, having been the playground of many corporate interests in the past decades.

if you have an interesting solution to that problem, you can always submit a patch or pull request for review.