Provide an ltest executable

[cinova]

Provide an ltest executable

[arpunk]

rebar3 is enough for this, what is currently missing is being able to run common_test suites.

Code coverage is out of the question and probably a fair warning in the README could help newcomers expecting a one-to-one mapping to Erlang tooling.

[oubiwann]

yeah, I would definitely be interested in accepting a patch for common_test -- I think ltest is a good home for that set of functionality. I might actually use common test if there was Lisply sane, conceptually coherent way of using it ;-)

Not only does rebar3 mostly solve this, that itself will likely be wrapped by ltool (which is still quite experimental ... in fact, so experimental that I haven't merged the changes that added a ./bin dir with an ltool escriptized executable wrapping rebar3).

Closing ...

[arpunk]

Right now we can use lfetool test all to invoke the ltest runner. We can use different testing environments aswell.

[yurrriq]

I think rebar3 solves this one too.

[arpunk]

@yurrriq You are right. rebar3 runs all the EUnit test cases (written with ltest).

[yurrriq]

I think this can probably be closed unless rebar3 support isn't enough.