Documentation and examples for "ownership context" and "data context"

[lihaoyi]

Documentation and examples for "ownership context" and "data context"

[Voltir]

I have several libraries that build on top of scala.rx, these two in particular have demo code associated with them that are good examples of "real world" uses involving ownership and data contexts:

https://github.com/Voltir/form.rx

https://github.com/Voltir/route.rx

As for your question - it depends. Technically it doesn't, but if you happen to be using the REPL, then it does (at least, im pretty sure it does). If that was defined in a statically scoped object, it would compile just fine.

[ajaychandran]

@Voltir Thanks for the links, will check them out.

Also, the code block above does compile when defined in a static scope.

[Voltir]

Er, right. I guess the answer to your question is that it uses the "top-level" context because the macro code knows it is statically defined and there can only ever be one instance of c (this is implemented as trickery with @compileTimeOnly). More generally basically any Rx defined directly in an object' won't complain about needing an implicit owning context because of this static check.