Support Spring Security @Secured annotation

[lognet]

Support Spring Security @Secured annotation

[alexleigh]

I've also put together a standalone example of method-based security with gRPC (using pre-post-annotations instead of secured-annotations) with an exception-to-status translator, using Authorization metadata for Basic Auth credentials and JWT tokens. It works pretty well for our production use-case, though the default ThreadLocal security context storage is less than ideal.

[cbornet]

Maybe related but there is also the need to translate the exception. An exception translator like Spring's ControllerAdvice would be awesome

[pagrus7]

Out of interest I've put together an example of Secured annotation (which just works) and a basic exception-to-status translation interceptor.

I don't think that would be sufficient to cover a meaningful scenario though. Just curious, where the authentication will be coming from in the intended use case?

[alex-lzl]

WARNING: The security demo by revinate and the security example by pagrus7 are vulnerable to concurrency issues.

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I just ran into the concurrency issue mentioned above and super lucky found your post. Also just in time for the release of net.devh:grpc-spring-boot-starter:2.2.0.RELEASE.

[majusko]

@cbornet , @ST-DDT , @jvmlet

Probably not interested anymore, but if so:

I created a simple JWT Spring Boot Starter extending this library from LogNet: https://github.com/majusko/grpc-jwt-spring-boot-starter

Already using it in few production projects so it will be definitely supported. Also, feel free to contribute ;)

Simple usage showcase here:
https://github.com/majusko/grpc-example/blob/master/src/main/kotlin/io/github/majusko/grpc/example/ServerExample.kt

[jorgheymans]

probably same as #41 ?

[cbornet]

I guess I should try again because spring.aop.proxy-target-class=true didn't work for me when I tried it ...

[alexleigh]

I've also had weird issues with the method security AOP interceptors not applying to the gRPC implementation class at times. In fact, in my standalone example, if I remove spring-jdbc from runtime dependencies, the AOP stops applying.

[pagrus7]

@alexleigh I think you are hitting another flavour of the autoproxying issue. By default spring boot 1.x would use a a dynamic proxies, but with spring-jdbc and spring-tx pulled into the classpath the autoconfiguration kicks in and configures cglib proxies instead.

I opened a PR which explicitly specifies proxyTargetClass = true on @EnableGlobalMethodSecurity annotation. Security then still works without spring-boot-starter-jdbc.

[alexleigh]

That's really good to know. Thanks for the help!

[ST-DDT]

See also grpc/grpc-java#4970

---

EDIT

WARNING

The security examples linked above have security vulnerabilities and are dangerous to use. See below for more details.

[cbornet]

@ST-DDT I've seen your discussion on the grpc-java issue. Do you know how to proceed ?

[ST-DDT]

In order for SpringSecurity to work you need two things:

1. ServerInterceptors (See the example linked above (Security issues))
   • With Exception mapping
   • With SecurityContext builder/Authentication
2. A security annotated GrpcService impl
   • Which has either an interface with ALL methods (created and maintained by yourself, or somehow generated at compile time)
   • Or you use @EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(proxyTargetClass = true) and be okay with one line of warning per service class during each startup.

If you get an INTERNAL status response, then you have an issue with the first one.
If you get an UNAVAILABLE status response, then you have an issue with the second one.
If the user can pass through unauthenticated then you probably have to configure the annotation to enable your desired annotation.

As an alternative you could avoid the security annotation and use another server interceptor to map the access checks yourself. Using something like similar to a Map<MethodDescriptor, AccessDecider>.

PS: I might be able to contribute the server interceptors (if I get the permission).

[jvmlet]

@cbornet , @ST-DDT , have you seen this ? He is using this starter and implemented interceptors to integrate spring security together with authorization.
I've asked the author if he want to contribute to this repo... still no answer.

[ST-DDT]

That example is somewhat better than the above mentioned, as it used an AuthenticationManager. But it also has a few drawbacks:

• It hasn't been contributed to this project and is no standalone library (-> copy & paste)
• It uses a different license (-> so you have to actually add the license statements to those classes/wrapper library (not that big of a problem though))
• Analyses the cause stack which you might not want, especially if you have other ExceptionMappers
• Lacks in code documentation/javadocs
• EDIT: Both have security issues

Don't get me wrong, it is good code, but puts some obstacle in your way to use and maintain it.

EDIT: And its dangerous to use.

[ST-DDT]

WARNING

The security demo by revinate and the security example by pagrus7 are vulnerable to concurrency issues.

You might see the following issues:

• Unauthenticated users can execute calls
• Authenticated requests get rejected due to UNAUTHENTICATED
• Authenticated requests might show a different username

During my tests this issues only occurred in very few cases (aka hard to reproduce) .
It's easily reproducible by executing at least two calls (with different auth status) simultaneously .
It's easier to reproduce the bug with (many) concurrent calls by different users (including unauthenticated ones) and maybe a busy CPU (to force the thread context switches).

You can avoid that issue by rewriting the authenticating interceptors to work similar to grpc-contexts.
Or have a look at my PR (https://github.com/yidongnan/grpc-spring-boot-starter/pull/126) which tries to fix that issue for a different grpc-spring-boot library.

See also this SO question/answer

---

That issue is not related to this repository. It's only related to the mentioned security demo and all variants that work in a similar way.

[jvmlet]

Thanks for sharing, @majusko. I'll definitely have a look

[balchua]

Is there some plan on supporting spring security? Thanks.

[jvmlet]

It's better later than never :-), implemented in 4.0.0