Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

Comments (4)

lorenzo-rovigatti avatar lorenzo-rovigatti commented on September 16, 2024

Hi,

the maximum stacking energy depends on temperature T, on the model and on whether you are using the sequence-dependent or average-sequence parametrisation. For the average-sequence models:

  • average oxDNA: -(1.3448 + 2.6568 * T)
  • average oxDNA2: -(1.3523 + 2.6717 * T)
  • average oxRNA: -(1.40206 + 2.77 * T)

For the sequence-dependent models the maximum stacking energy also depends on the pair of nucleotides you are looking at:

  • seq-dep oxDNA/oxDNA2: -STCK_X_Y * (1 - STCK_FACT_EPS + (T * 9.0 * STCK_FACT_EPS)
  • seq-dep oxRNA: -STCK_X_Y * (1.0 + T * ST_T_DEP)

where STACK_FACT_EPS and ST_T_DEP and STCK_X_Y (where X and Y are A, C, G, T or U if RNA) can be found in the files that specify the sequence-dependent parametrisations (usually oxDNA/oxDNA1_sequence_dependent_parameters.txt, oxDNA/oxDNA2_sequence_dependent_parameters.txt and oxDNA/rna_sequence_dependent_parameters.txt).

Edit: usually nucleotides are either bonded/stacked or not, meaning that the specific value of the threshold is not super important, as long as you don't pick a value that's too close to the maximum. Using something like -0.2-0.3 should work, but look at the distributions of the energies you get from your simulations before choosing!

from oxdna.

skyminer360 avatar skyminer360 commented on September 16, 2024

This is very helpful, thank you! And your last comment confirms a suspicion I had, since I noticed these thresholds are never set to precise values.

I'm assuming these values are only for normal stacking. Would the maximum stacking energies for cross stacking or coaxial stacking be much different? i.e. would the same thresholds work? I'm using the average sequence model.

from oxdna.

lorenzo-rovigatti avatar lorenzo-rovigatti commented on September 16, 2024

The functional form of the cross- and coaxial stacking is a bit different than the stacking one, and it's a bit harder to obtain the numbers you are after just looking at the code. It's probably faster if you simulate a fully-formed duplex, use output_bonds and look at the energy distributions for the cross- and coaxial-stacking terms.

from oxdna.

skyminer360 avatar skyminer360 commented on September 16, 2024

That makes sense. Thanks again!

from oxdna.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.