Private setters prevent unit testing

[maxmind]

Private setters prevent unit testing

[oschwald]

I don't know if we would want public setters as mutable data is messy, but it would make sense to add a constructor with named/optional arguments.

As a stop-gap, you could deserialize to the class using Newtonsoft.Json as is done in this test and internally.

[jwynveen]

A constructor with optional arguments would be great. What would be the timing for this to be implemented and released? Are we looking at days, weeks, or months?

[oschwald]

I don't think we have a particular timeline. Pull requests are welcomed though.