Mixed Bilinear Form Integrator for Strong Laplacian in IGA

[michi002]

Mixed Bilinear Form Integrator for Strong Laplacian in IGA

[bslazarov]

Hi Michael,

You should be able to contribute now.

Best regards, Boyan

[michi002]

I have started implementing this as a "mfem::MixedDiffusionDiffusion" integrator.
Right now I encountered two things, where I would need help:
-) I have read the "CONTRIBUTING.md" file and proceeded as stated there. But I cannot push a development branch to the server, as I am only in the users group. What do I need to do to contribute?
-) I did not find much about IGA on the website. Is there a resource, to find out how the "mesh" input files are structured and how MFEM handles NURBS geometries and ansatz functions?

Thanks and greetings,
Michael

[IdoAkkerman]

I opened a related issue #4238 related to the Laplace terms.
I have also started a NURBS section on the website, related to the NURBS H(div) and H(curl) PR.

I have implemented the terms as mention in the issue.
I called itLaplaceLaplaceIntegrator and BiHarmIntegratoras alias.

[IdoAkkerman]

Regarding the mesh documentation I was doubting what to put on the website.
Cox de Boor algorithm and such is a lot of effort to put on the site but not useful.
I did not think about the mesh format... but that is an obvious one.
I will try to write something, perhaps you (@michi002) can help me by judging whether it is clear and useful.

[michi002]

I opened a related issue #4238 related to the Laplace terms. I have also started a NURBS section on the website, related to the NURBS H(div) and H(curl) PR.

I have implemented the terms as mention in the issue. I called itLaplaceLaplaceIntegrator and BiHarmIntegratoras alias.

@IdoAkkerman
Perfect. I saw your post today, but was on the mobile, so you were first.
Did you already implement this bilinear forms? If yes on which branch?
I would happly help you in improving the documentation, as well as coding the bilinear forms, if it did not happen yet.
Some questions arised in your post:
Do you want to have this operators for H^2 conforming functions (that is what I need), implying that we need C^1 ansatz functions. Do you also want to consider instead of the laplacian operators of the form
$Tu = \nabla \cdot \left( A \nabla u\right)$
wher $A$ is a matrix coefficient with the bilinear form
$a(u,v) = \langle Tu, Tv\rangle$?
This would imply, that we somehow would have to deal with the chain rule for non-constant coefficients.

Greetings,
Michael

[IdoAkkerman]

I have not commit yet. I can do that tomorrow after noon.

[IdoAkkerman]

I have committed my stuff in the branch dev-stab-mini .

The miniapps in miniapps/stabilized are still very rough. But things seem to converge:
For instance:

• ./laplace -b -o 3 shows the convergence of the Galerkin form for the biharmonic problem. With essential BCs on the solution.
• ./ex_condif -s 1 -o 3 shows the convergence of the SUPS formulation for convection diffusion.

[michi002]

@IdoAkkerman did push it to the general mfem repository? I cannot find that branch (also not on the Website).
But maybe I am just to stupid.
And thank you for sharing :)