Identify a branch that isn't set upstream

[michaeldfallen]

Identify a branch that isn't set upstream

[michaeldfallen]

This has been fixed. Both bash_color_remote_commits and zsh_color_remote_commits now return:

git:(upstream ⚡ my-branch)

If the branch is not upstream.

[jackmaney]

First of all, thank you for releasing this library. I've been looking off and on for a simple to use, 100% bash solution to this.

I was about to start an issue, but I think this one touches on it... I'm in a repo whose only branches (via git remote -a) are master and remotes/origin/master. Also, these branches are completely in sync (ie git status reveals that the working directory is clean).

However, the prompt is still git:(upstream ⚡ master).

[michaeldfallen]

Thanks for the kind words. That this has gone from pet project to full blown used by people thing is amazing.

I do think there are a few problems with tracking branches, one example is when you have two remotes and checkout master on those remotes to two different locations.

can you run git remote -a -vvv and comment with the results? if master tracks correctly this shouldn't happen so I'd like to know what's going on too.