Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

Missing docName about mmark HOT 8 CLOSED

mmarkdown avatar mmarkdown commented on September 21, 2024
Missing docName

from mmark.

Comments (8)

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

I've raised this on the xml2rfc-dev list; RFC 7991 says it's removed, but xml2rfc still implements it and IETF now rejects it.

This is in part because the XMLv3 effort is not going too well... For docName you re-used seriesInfo.value?

from mmark.

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

See https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/?qdr=d

This is easily fixed, but I'm not sure what the final way of doing this will be and if this would invalidate any XML now generated :/

from mmark.

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

Per https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xml2rfc-dev/?qdr=d

I'd like to know the rejection message from the datatracker. There are
any number of possible rejection reasons that have nothing to do with
docName, even if the description in #76 seems to indicate that it's related.

I may be able to fish the rejection reason out if I know the draft name and
submission date. Could you provide that?

I'll check the code to see if the warning should be an error, but would really
like to see the rejection message to understand what's up.

I know need to make code changes for something that is actually not described
anywhere, but seems mandatory.

You can expect that docName will continue to be needed.

from mmark.

FiloSottile avatar FiloSottile commented on September 21, 2024

The rejection reason was

No docName attribute found in the xml root element

I am pretty sure it's about docName 😄 and simply setting it to seriesInfo.value generated what is now draft-hdevalence-cfrg-ristretto-01.

from mmark.

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

See #77, can you test? I don't have a I-D laying around (although some test I-D might make sense here)

from mmark.

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

Should be fixed iwth #77

from mmark.

dunglas avatar dunglas commented on September 21, 2024

Hi, this doesn't look to be fixed.

xml2rfc also wants the docName attribute on the rfc element.
If it helps, you can try with this ID: https://github.com/dunglas/mercure/blob/master/spec/mercure.md

from mmark.

miekg avatar miekg commented on September 21, 2024

from mmark.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.