Stand-alone posix-ng coverage test fails to build

[nasa]

Stand-alone posix-ng coverage test fails to build

[skliper]

@jphickey shared works, posix-ng looks broken

[skliper]

Looks like it's from -I/home/jhageman/cFS/cFS-GitHub/osal/src/os/posix-ng, since it's now posix

[skliper]

Tried git mv posix-ng posix, and -DOSALCOVERAGE_TARGET_OSTYPE='posix', and it now fails with:

[ 42%] Building C object posix/modules/CMakeFiles/ut_posix_osapi.dir/src/ut-osapi.c.o
In file included from /home/jhageman/cFS/cFS-GitHub/osal/src/unit-test-coverage/posix/modules/src/ut-osapi.c:9:0:
/home/jhageman/cFS/cFS-GitHub/osal/src/os/posix/osapi.c: In function ‘OS_ConsoleCreate_Impl’:
/home/jhageman/cFS/cFS-GitHub/osal/src/os/posix/osapi.c:47:33: error: ‘STDOUT_FILENO’ undeclared (first use in this function)
 #define OSAL_CONSOLE_FILENO     STDOUT_FILENO

and others.

[jphickey]

Note that previous OSAL versions only ever had a coverage test for vxworks6. There was never a coverage test available for posix at all.

The stuff for posix under unit-test-coverage is the start of something, but quite incomplete. It was never a focus of testing because AFAIK the coverage test was only a requirement for VxWorks OS.

I can probably fix the immediate build issues to make it work at least into something buildable and runnable, but note this would be a new feature as it is not something that OSAL previously offered.

[skliper]

Marked as an enhancement to reflect Joe's comment (new feature). Providing coverage metrics for rtems is likely higher priority than posix, although they are both in the plan to provide the certification framework for projects that will need to show coverage statistics.

[skliper]

This issue is OBE, opening a new one to implement coverage tests for posix-ng, #412