A progressive JPEG that gives 'bad huffman code'

[nothings]

A progressive JPEG that gives 'bad huffman code'

[ybungalobill]

I can confirm that this happens on some JPEGs, not necessarily progressive.

[nothings]

ybb, can you send me such a non-progressive JPEG or a link to one? It might be the same thing or it might be something different, so I need a sample image.

[ybungalobill]

Err, sorry. I was too impatient to double-check. They are progressive. Here are some if you need more to test.

These say "bad huffman code":
http://40.media.tumblr.com/424f289d7f2e2a02636b264693a2d159/tumblr_n9rgjzeeXY1r493ruo2_r1_500.jpg
http://41.media.tumblr.com/319546120a728c619dc6e93164040f7d/tumblr_ndg8ez34Ww1qz7ywso1_500.jpg

These say "junk before marker":
http://36.media.tumblr.com/80724ad0d70f6345f0d7b40e69804558/tumblr_ndjttanVnB1qz7ywso1_1280.jpg
http://41.media.tumblr.com/1ce735e8c44894d245305b63f50633c8/tumblr_ndk2jm09Fi1qz7ywso1_1280.jpg

[nothings]

Thanks.

[nothings]

I'm about to do a new release, so I put some work into this, but I couldn't figure it out. I'm going to have to run these files through another jpeg decoder and see where I deviate, but getting another jpeg decoder set up will be a pain... maybe for next release.

[nothings]

Should be fixed in version 2.05