style issues while implementing

[taeymma]

style issues while implementing

[koenedaele]

About the relations. Currently the follow kinds of relations exist:

• narrower: Concept A has narrower Concept B
• broader: Concept B has broader Concept A
• related: Concept A has related Concept D
• subordinate array: Concept B has subordinate array Collection C
• superordinate: Collection C has superordinate Concept B
• member: Collection C has member Concept M OR Collection C has member Collection CM
• member of: Concept M is member of Collection C OR Collection CM is member of Concept C

While these are all correct according to the SKOS and ISO-SKOS specs, they can be a bit overwhelming for newbies. So, in the public interface I'd like to see them being listed as:

• narrower, member, subordinate array: narrower
• broader, member of, superordinate: broader
• related: related

[koenedaele]

Apart from these relations there's also something called matches. They are very similar, but are always to Concepts or Collections in other ConceptSchemes. Quite often there will be no matches at all.

I would suggest listing those at the bottom, styled like the relations, but include the type of match in every rectangle.