The people vs @jdonkervliet 1

[MrHug]

The people vs @jdonkervliet 1

[MrHug]

I call forth @pimotte and @arthurbik for jury duty.

[jdonkervliet]

Sure.

[jdonkervliet]

I plead Guilty, and would like a punishment equal to the number of points suggested by the prosecutor.

[jdonkervliet]

The defense rests.

[MrHug]

I hold the defendant Guilty of this violation, but due to the nature of this offense I will not demand a point reduction. I only ask the jury to still award him the point he should have gotten for #12 thus restoring the game state.

Unless the jury has questions, the prosecution requests a Verdict.

[pimotte]

I have no questions, and would be in favour of a Guilty verdict. Let's see what @arthurbik has to say.

[arthurbik]

I have no questions and do not believe there is a point to this trial, since the prosecutor and defendant want the same thing. Can I try to convince @pimotte that the defendant is Not-Guilty, thereby preventing him from getting a point?

I am in favour of a Guilty verdict. To restore the game state he should get a point.

[pimotte]

This case is completely clear to me. I see no room for misinterpretation of the facts.

The Jury rules a Guilty verdict, and consequently a 0 point reduction, since that is the only option that yields from the demands of prosecution and the defendants plea. I will merge Jesse's pull request to rectify the game state.

[MrHug]

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 19:50 Pim Otte, [email protected] wrote:

Closed #44 #44.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#44 (comment), or mute the
thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ADE2M21gDBnpcpbxc3su4-4fAAFcJ5n3ks5qHxf1gaJpZM4IskHE
.

[MrHug]