Include rule `ij_kotlin_wrap_first_method_in_call_chain = false`

[Kolyall]

Include rule `ij_kotlin_wrap_first_method_in_call_chain = false`

[paul-dingemans]

Sorry but this will not be implemented as it conflicts with chain-method-continuation which aligns/wraps all . and ?. before call expressions. Also, there will be no option added to make this configurable (https://pinterest.github.io/ktlint/latest/faq/#can-a-new-toggle-be-added-to-optionally-enabledisable-format-code-in-a-particular-way).

[Kolyall]

@paul-dingemans it conflicts with chain-method-continuation only if chain-method-continuation = 1.
And in this case you may notify user about this conflict

[paul-dingemans]

only if chain-method-continuation = 1.

What do you mean with this?

[Kolyall]

@paul-dingemans
Cases:

1. If config is:

ktlint_standard_chain-method-continuation = 1
ij_kotlin_wrap_first_method_in_call_chain = false

Expected result will be:
conflict

2. If config is:

ktlint_standard_chain-method-continuation = 2
ij_kotlin_wrap_first_method_in_call_chain = false

Expected result will be:

viewModel.getUserStatus()
            .onEach {}
            .launchIn(viewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope)

3. If config is:

ktlint_standard_chain-method-continuation = 3
ij_kotlin_wrap_first_method_in_call_chain = false

Expected result will be:

viewModel.getUserStatus().onEach {}
            .launchIn(viewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope)

[paul-dingemans]

Why do you think that property ktlint_standard_chain-method-continuation can have a numeric value? This property can only be set with value enabled or disabled. The only numeric property for this rule is ktlint_chain_method_rule_force_multiline_when_chain_operator_count_greater_or_equal_than. See https://pinterest.github.io/ktlint/latest/rules/experimental/#chain-method-continuation.