Python API compatibility with custom Papermill engines

[rmshkv]

Python API compatibility with custom Papermill engines

[edublancas]

this sounds like a regression error. we added executor in 0.22.4, can you try using 0.22.3?

@mehtamohit013: do you remember why we added this validation? looks like a bug. allowing people to use a custom papermill engine sounds reasonable

[mehtamohit013]

@edublancas
It seems papermill also uses the engine_name parameter. So, what does engine_name intend to do is, select from Papermill and ploomber-engine. We can completely remove the engine_name and use only the executor param or can use something like executor_name? The code should run fine with version 0.22.3.

[rmshkv]

Thanks for looking into this! I tested with 0.22.3 and it works as expected (with executor_params changed to papermill_params)