Custom functions appear to return HTTP status 404

[powerdns]

Custom functions appear to return HTTP status 404

[neilcook]

Ok two things:

1. There is already a getDBStats command that does exactly what you want to do with this custom function. Look at docs/swagger/wforce_api.7.yml.
2. I've tried your function, and I don't get a 404, I get a 200 OK. Can you send an example session with output and logs? Are you using the latest commit from master?

[neilcook]

FYI, this is what I see when running your function:
Neil-Cook-MBP-2:~ ncook$ curl -v -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" --data '{ "attrs": { "login":"ahu", "remote": "127.0.0.1", "pwhash":"1234'$a'", "success":"false"}}' -u wforce:super http://127.0.0.1:8084/?command=getstats
Note: Unnecessary use of -X or --request, POST is already inferred.

• Trying 127.0.0.1...
• TCP_NODELAY set
• Connected to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 8084 (#0)
• Server auth using Basic with user 'wforce'

POST /?command=getstats HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8084
Authorization: Basic d2ZvcmNlOnN1cGVy
User-Agent: curl/7.51.0
Accept: /
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 87

• upload completely sent off: 87 out of 87 bytes
  < HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  < Transfer-Encoding: chunked
  < Content-Type: application/json
  <
• Curl_http_done: called premature == 0
• Connection #0 to host 127.0.0.1 left intact
  {"r_attrs": {"failedpasswordsbyip": "0", "failedpasswordsbylogin": "0", "ip": "127.0.0.1", "login": "ahu"}, "success": true}

Looking at the code, 404 is only returned if a command is not found.

[sshipway]

We're using the latest stable tag, v1.2.1, packaged into an RPM by OX.
The getDBStats command (and the delBLendtry and getBL etc commands) look very useful, thanks for the pointer. If they're present in the version we're using I can certainly make use of them. I hadn't seen this extra documentation page - I'd been relying on the man pages and other online resources, which only mention allow/report/reset.

In our version, it's definitely returning a 404, but also returning the expected function output, which doesn't make sense to me. I'll investigate more tomorrow and see if I can get any more info - try with a null function, etc. When the next stable version comes out as an RPM I'll upgrade to that; I'm looking forward to the GeoIPCity info and performance stats queryable via the API.

[neilcook]

I hadn't seen this extra documentation page - I'd been relying on the man pages and other online
resources, which only mention allow/report/reset.

http://oxpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=AppSuite:Dovecot_Antiabuse_Shield contains a bunch of useful links, including a link to the API documentation which we maintain online. When you got the RPM from OX, they should have given you a link to this page, but maybe this didn't happen.

We're using the latest stable tag, v1.2.1, packaged into an RPM by OX.

In which case you might want to think about using the standard support mechanism for OX (e.g. our bugzilla instance). Are you working for/with SMX?

Also, I will try your custom function with 1.2.1, as I was testing against the latest master.

In our version, it's definitely returning a 404, but also returning the expected function output, which
doesn't make sense to me.

I rewrote the web server handling code recently, which is probably why I couldn't reproduce in master.

When the next stable version comes out as an RPM I'll upgrade to that; I'm looking forward to the GeoIPCity info and performance stats queryable via the API.

Yes there will probably be a 1.3 release sometime in the next few months, as we've added some useful features since 1.2.1, and 2.0 won't be out until the end of the year.

[neilcook]

Ok I can reproduce the custom endpoint 404 issue, and I've identified the problem. As I said this is fixed in the dev branch - is this something you need fixing in the short-term, or can you wait for a 1.3 release in a few months?

[sshipway]

Thanks for the update. We can wait for the 1.3 release when it comes out, as we need that for the other new features anyway.

If you're looking for new feature suggestions, then a way to query if a given key already exists in an HLL database would be nice :) (so that an allow function can find out in advance if an HLL count will be incremented by the subsequent report)

[neilcook]

If you're looking for new feature suggestions, then a way to query if a given key already exists in an HLL database would be nice

This isn't really possible, given that the way HLL works. It's essentially a bitmap, and so it doesn't preserve what was put in, only the cardinality. The only way to find out if a key already exists is indeed to add a new value, and see if the count gets incremented.
If you want that behaviour explicitly, you could look at the countmin type, (which takes a lot more RAM BTW - around 3x that of HLL), but that gives you counts-per-value. I could also potentially add a bloom filter type in future, which simply tells you whether a given value exists in a set (i.e. was it already added), but doesn't give cardinality.

[neilcook]

Closing as fixed in master