Validations "QOR Support" section

[qor]

Validations "QOR Support" section

[raven-chen]

Removed unnecessary QOR support text.

[coreform]

Those are remnants of the per-repo README documentation. For the new monolithic Doc, I have been changing that section to 'QOR Integration', removing the basic QOR introduction paragraph and replacing with something like:

Although Location could be used alone, it integrates nicely with QOR.

E.g.:
https://github.com/qor/doc/blob/master/plugins/i18n.md
https://github.com/qor/doc/blob/master/plugins/l10n.md

adccebf
^ shows some work to improve that section. It is not redundant as it makes it clear that such Plugins can be used standalone. Ideally, we would be achieving clarity and consistency, rather than just consistency as a result of this Issue.

[coreform]

Reopening as it would be ideal to follow the new pattern for QOR Integration sections (consistency) in applicable Plugins.

[bodhi]

Although Location could be used alone, it integrates nicely with QOR

This seems odd: this is the QOR doc, and Location is being described as a QOR plugin, so it would be strange if it didn't integrate nicely?

[raven-chen]

Yeah. Better to separate it into two sections. "Integrate with QOR" and "Use it alone". Let's just focus on the first section for now ?

[coreform]

It would be nice if there were more information about how each Plugin integrates with QOR (because that is effectively what QOR is: an integration of components and Plugins). Like the information provided in https://github.com/qor/doc/blob/master/plugins/activity.md , that would give developers a better understanding of what to expect to see and the behaviour in QOR Admin when a Plugin is used.

[raven-chen]

@coreform yes. https://doc.getqor.com/helpers/render.html this is a good negative example. I'm working on it now.