Casting of empty ListTag is error-prone

[querz]

Casting of empty ListTag is error-prone

[Querz]

and when you then use the list at a completely unrelated place you suddenly get an exception.

This would not change by passing the type class to the constructor.
The point of having generics is that the type is already ensured at compile time, therefore the actual solution would be to remove all convenience methods that add values directly to a ListTag like e.g. ListTag#addString(). I made a compromise by having generic methods on the one hand that use the Tag classes for type safety and on the other hand having convenience methods that are consistent with the other structure tags (CompoundTag and StructTag).

[Marcono1234]

When the type is passed to the constructor it would already be initialized when you try to add an element of the incorrect type.

Then the special case in checkValue would have to be removed

NBT/src/main/java/net/querz/nbt/ListTag.java

Line 335 in 947c750

if (typeID != 0 && t.getID() != typeID) {

And the modification of the tag type in the add method

NBT/src/main/java/net/querz/nbt/ListTag.java

Lines 88 to 89 in 947c750

	typeID = t.getID();
	typeClass = t.getClass();

Additionally it would probably be good to have a protected or private method addUnchecked(Tag<?>) to prevent all the casts and SuppressWarnings annotations for the type specific methods.

[Querz]

I'll have too look into how deserialisation works with that, because the type of the list is read after it's been instantiated.

[Querz]

An empty ListTag can now only be untyped if created using the protected static method ListTag.createUnchecked(). ListTag#getTypeClass() will return EndTag.class if the type is not specified and the ListTag is empty. From this untyped state, the LisTag can only ever change it's type once using any of the set(), add...() or as...List() methods. A ListTag of type EndTag can not be created anymore. If attempting to do so it will throw an IllegalArgumentException.

#clone(), #equals() and #hashCode() have been adjusted to include the type class in their actions.

The ListTag constructor now needs a mandatory type class additionally to the ListTag generic type specification. The type class passed to the constructor must be of the exact same type as the generic type.

ListTag<StringTag> s = new ListTag<>(StringTag.class);
ListTag<ListTag<?>> l = new ListTag<>(ListTag.class);