Benchmark Issue

[rinkal26783]

Benchmark Issue

[RainbowMiner]

Sorry for that! It could be a problem with the config files.
Please stop RainbowMiner and update to new bugfix release. This should cleanup.

https://github.com/RainbowMiner/RainbowMiner/releases/download/v3.8.0.3/RainbowMinerV3.8.0.3.zip

RBM

[RainbowMiner]

If the problem persists, even with v3.8.0.3 (https://github.com/RainbowMiner/RainbowMiner/releases/download/v3.8.0.3/RainbowMinerV3.8.0.3.zip), please let me know.

[rinkal26783]

have been mining x16r from last 20 minutes.

don't know when it will go to next algo

[rinkal26783]

{
"VersionCompatibility": "3.8.0.3",
"API_ID": "$API_ID",
"API_Key": "$API_Key",
"SSL": "$SSL",
"ExcludeCoin": "$ExcludeCoin",
"Delay": "$Delay",
"MinerStatusUrl": "$MinerStatusUrl",
"MinerStatusKey": "$MinerStatusKey",
"SwitchingPrevention": "$SwitchingPrevention",
"DisableAutoUpdate": "$DisableAutoUpdate",
"ExcludeMinersWithFee": "$ExcludeMinersWithFee",
"RemoteAPI": "$RemoteAPI",
"RebootOnGPUFailure": "$RebootOnGPUFailure",
"Wallet": "34qbpoXtRcTvom65Jys3VZD95P3MXerbdj",
"WorkerName": "phoenix",
"UserName": "jaimin26783",
"Proxy": "",
"Region": "europe",
"Currency": "BTC,USD",
"PoolName": "MiningPoolHub,NiceHash",
"ExcludePoolName": "AHashPool,BlazePool,Blockcruncher,BlockMasters,Bsod,Hashrefinery,MiningPoolHubCoins,PhiPhiPool,Ravenminer,YiiMP,ZergPool,ZergPoolCoins,Zpool",
"MinerName": "",
"ExcludeMinerName": "",
"Algorithm": "allium,ethash,keccakc,lyra2z,equihash,poly,x16s,yescryptr16,blake2s,keccak,cryptonightheavy,yespower,phi,equihash192,c11,hmq1725,pascal,myrgr,hodl,phi2,skunk,cryptonightv7,cryptonightlite,equihash144,hex,x17,hsr,m7m,tribus,xevan,skein,lyra2re2,neoscrypt,timetravel,yescrypt,renesis,x16r,sonoa",
"ExcludeAlgorithm": "",
"MiningMode": "combo",
"ShowPoolBalances": "1",
"ShowMinerWindow": "0",
"FastestMinerOnly": "1",
"UIstyle": "full",
"DeviceName": "nvidia",
"Interval": 60,
"Donate": 24,
"Watchdog": "1",
"IgnoreFees": "0",
"DisableDualMining": "1",
"MSIAprofile": 2,
"MSIApath": "c:\Program Files (x86)\MSI Afterburner\MSIAfterburner.exe",
"UseTimeSync": "0",
"PowerPrice": 0.08,
"PowerPriceCurrency": "USD",
"UsePowerPrice": "1",
"CheckProfitability": "0"
}

[hernandn01]

It is only benchmarking on one card too

[RainbowMiner]

Ok, I got it. Sorry for the inconvenience. There has been a problem with benchmarks, when the usePowerPrice has been set to "1". This problem should now be solved:

Please download and install bugfix release v3.8.0.4
https://github.com/RainbowMiner/RainbowMiner/releases/download/v3.8.0.4/RainbowMinerV3.8.0.4.zip

RBM

[RainbowMiner]

@hernandn01 : would you please zip your Logs folder and paste it here? Also, please provide your current config.txt

[hernandn01]

I am using v3.8.0.4 and using usePowerPrice = 1 and benchmarks on all cards are working now. I assumed usePowerPrice was the actual cost in decimals of KWH

[RainbowMiner]

Super :) Phew! I am happy, if this issue is resolved.

• PowerPrice = actual cost for 1 kWh as decimal. E.g. 0.23
• PowerPriceCurrency = currency of PowerPrice. E.g. USD
• UsePowerPrice = if set to 1, the electricity cost will be substracted from the actual miner's profit
• CheckProfitability = if set to 1, RainbowMiner will stop mining, if no more miners are profitable. If profitability returns, mining operation will be resumed automatically.

[hernandn01]

How about a mix solution for the cards that do not report power consumption. I have 1050 ti that do not. Maybe a setting in miners.config.txt for those cards? Consumption should be observed at the wall for those cards and set the watt number static per algo.

[RainbowMiner]

@hernandn01 : Good idea, even though it implies a lot of hand work. I will think about it.

[RainbowMiner]

@hernandn01 : regarding the problem with the GTX 1050ti, I found it is a known problem with the NVIDIA drivers. It seems, Nvidia disabled the watt reading for this card model.
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1024744/linux/nvidia-387-12-breaks-power-reading-in-nvidia-smi-/1
So, adding a static power value to the miners.config.txt looks like the only safe solution, at the moment.

[RainbowMiner]

@hernandn01 : could you open the web-interface at http://localhost:4000 , click "Selected Devices". You will see a table with all your mining devices. Now click on the little "+", in the row of your GTX1050Ti.
Would you please copy-and-paste the full data window here? (it is the opened, with the grey background). Maybe we can aproximate the powerconsumption.

[hernandn01]

I have two 1050 ti, copied both, powerdraw is NaN as mentioned in your previous link from Nvidia

Index: 2
PlatformId: 1
PlatformId_Index: 0
Type_PlatformId_Index: 0
Vendor: "NVIDIA"
Vendor_Name: "NVIDIA Corporation"
Vendor_Index: 0
Type_Vendor_Index: 0
Type: "Gpu"
Type_Index: 1
OpenCL: {"AddressBits":64,"Available":true,"CompilerAvailable":true,"DoubleFpConfig":"FpDenorm, FpInfNan, FpRoundToNearest, FpRoundToZero, FpRoundToInf, FpFma","EndianLittle":true,"ErrorCorrectionSupport":false,"ExecCapabilities":"ExecKernel","Extensions":"cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_icd cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_nv_compiler_options cl_nv_device_attribute_query cl_nv_pragma_unroll cl_nv_d3d10_sharing cl_khr_d3d10_sharing cl_nv_d3d11_sharing cl_nv_copy_opts cl_nv_create_buffer","GlobalMemCacheSize":98304,"GlobalMemCacheType":2,"GlobalMemCachelineSize":128,"GlobalMemSize":4294967296,"ImageSupport":true,"LocalMemSize":49152,"LocalMemType":1,"MaxClockFrequency":1493,"MaxComputeUnits":6,"MaxConstantArgs":9,"MaxConstantBufferSize":null,"MaxMemAllocSize":1073741824,"MaxParameterSize":4352,"MaxReadImageArgs":256,"MaxSamplers":32,"MaxWorkGroupSize":1024,"MaxWorkItemDimensions":3,"MaxWorkItemSizes":"1024 1024 64","MaxWriteImageArgs":16,"MemBaseAddrAlign":4096,"MinDataTypeAlignSize":128,"Name":"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti","ClVersion":"OpenCL C 1.2 ","Platform":"@{Profile=FULL_PROFILE; Version=OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.156; Name=NVIDIA CUDA; Vendor=NVIDIA Corporation; Extensions=System.Object[]}","PreferredVectorWidthChar":1,"PreferredVectorWidthShort":1,"PreferredVectorWidthInt":1,"PreferredVectorWidthLong":1,"PreferredVectorWidthFloat":1,"PreferredVectorWidthDouble":1,"Profile":"FULL_PROFILE","QueueProperties":"OutOfOrderExecModeEnable, ProfilingEnable","SingleFpConfig":"FpDenorm, FpInfNan, FpRoundToNearest, FpRoundToZero, FpRoundToInf, FpFma, FpCorrectlyRoundedDivideSqrt","Type":"Gpu","Vendor":"NVIDIA Corporation","VendorId":4318,"Version":"OpenCL 1.2 CUDA","DriverVersion":"398.36"}
Model: "GTX1050Ti"
Model_Name: "GeForce GTX 1050 Ti"
Name: "GPU#01"
Data: {"Utilization":100,"UtilizationMem":16,"Temperature":61,"PowerDraw":null,"PowerLimit":106,"FanSpeed":62,"Pstate":" P0","Clock":1911,"ClockMem":4503,"PowerMaxLimit":130,"PowerDefaultLimit":120,"PowerLimitPercent":88}
tMemory: "4 GB"
tDriverVersion: "398.36"
tClockSpeed: 1493
tCores: 6
tPowerDraw: "NaN W"
tFanSpeed: "62 rpm"
tClock: "1911 MHz"
tClockMem: "4503 MHz"
tPowerLimitPercent: "88 %"
tTemperature: "61 °C"
tUtilization: "100 %"

Second 1050 ti

Index: 4
PlatformId: 1
PlatformId_Index: 2
Type_PlatformId_Index: 2
Vendor: "NVIDIA"
Vendor_Name: "NVIDIA Corporation"
Vendor_Index: 2
Type_Vendor_Index: 2
Type: "Gpu"
Type_Index: 3
OpenCL: {"AddressBits":64,"Available":true,"CompilerAvailable":true,"DoubleFpConfig":"FpDenorm, FpInfNan, FpRoundToNearest, FpRoundToZero, FpRoundToInf, FpFma","EndianLittle":true,"ErrorCorrectionSupport":false,"ExecCapabilities":"ExecKernel","Extensions":"cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_icd cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_nv_compiler_options cl_nv_device_attribute_query cl_nv_pragma_unroll cl_nv_d3d10_sharing cl_khr_d3d10_sharing cl_nv_d3d11_sharing cl_nv_copy_opts cl_nv_create_buffer","GlobalMemCacheSize":98304,"GlobalMemCacheType":2,"GlobalMemCachelineSize":128,"GlobalMemSize":4294967296,"ImageSupport":true,"LocalMemSize":49152,"LocalMemType":1,"MaxClockFrequency":1493,"MaxComputeUnits":6,"MaxConstantArgs":9,"MaxConstantBufferSize":null,"MaxMemAllocSize":1073741824,"MaxParameterSize":4352,"MaxReadImageArgs":256,"MaxSamplers":32,"MaxWorkGroupSize":1024,"MaxWorkItemDimensions":3,"MaxWorkItemSizes":"1024 1024 64","MaxWriteImageArgs":16,"MemBaseAddrAlign":4096,"MinDataTypeAlignSize":128,"Name":"GeForce GTX 1050 Ti","ClVersion":"OpenCL C 1.2 ","Platform":"@{Profile=FULL_PROFILE; Version=OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.2.156; Name=NVIDIA CUDA; Vendor=NVIDIA Corporation; Extensions=System.Object[]}","PreferredVectorWidthChar":1,"PreferredVectorWidthShort":1,"PreferredVectorWidthInt":1,"PreferredVectorWidthLong":1,"PreferredVectorWidthFloat":1,"PreferredVectorWidthDouble":1,"Profile":"FULL_PROFILE","QueueProperties":"OutOfOrderExecModeEnable, ProfilingEnable","SingleFpConfig":"FpDenorm, FpInfNan, FpRoundToNearest, FpRoundToZero, FpRoundToInf, FpFma, FpCorrectlyRoundedDivideSqrt","Type":"Gpu","Vendor":"NVIDIA Corporation","VendorId":4318,"Version":"OpenCL 1.2 CUDA","DriverVersion":"398.36"}
Model: "GTX1050Ti"
Model_Name: "GeForce GTX 1050 Ti"
Name: "GPU#03"
Data: {"Utilization":100,"UtilizationMem":16,"Temperature":51,"PowerDraw":null,"PowerLimit":60,"FanSpeed":51,"Pstate":" P0","Clock":1607,"ClockMem":4503,"PowerMaxLimit":130,"PowerDefaultLimit":120,"PowerLimitPercent":50}
tMemory: "4 GB"
tDriverVersion: "398.36"
tClockSpeed: 1493
tCores: 6
tPowerDraw: "NaN W"
tFanSpeed: "51 rpm"
tClock: "1607 MHz"
tClockMem: "4503 MHz"
tPowerLimitPercent: "50 %"
tTemperature: "51 °C"
tUtilization: "100 %"

[RainbowMiner]

Ok, I added TDP aproximation for Nvidia cards, also.
Please try the master.zip
https://github.com/RainbowMiner/RainbowMiner/archive/master.zip

• stop RainbowMiner
• unzip master.zip and overwrite all files
• start RainbowMiner

.. if we are lucky, the GTX1050Ti will now present it's powerdraw.

RBM

[hernandn01]

I get tPowerDraw: "0 W", I applied all commits including update watt calculation

[hernandn01]

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (GPU#01,GPU#03)

Miner Algorithm Speed Power BTC/Day USD/Day Accuracy Fee Pool

---

CryptoDredge Lyra2z 2.67 MH/s 0W 0.00013455 0.8228 98% 1.00% BlockMasters
Excavator1.4.4 NeoScrypt 1.04 MH/s 0W 0.00012984 0.7940 96% - BlockMasters
CryptoDredge Lyra2RE2 33.05 MH/s 0W 0.00010915 0.6675 94% 1.00% BlockMasters
CryptoDredge PHI2 5.26 MH/s 0W 0.00010770 0.6586 94% 1.00% BlockMasters-Luxcoin
EnemyZealot Hex 9.52 MH/s 0W 0.00009779 0.5980 98% 1.00% BlazePool
Trex X16S 9.45 MH/s 0W 0.00009390 0.5742 98% 1.00% BlockMasters
Ewbf Equihash24x5 32.00 H/s 0W 0.00009123 0.5579 98% - ZergPool
EnemyZealot X16R 12.30 MH/s 0W 0.00009649 0.5900 90% 1.00% ZergPool
Ewbf Equihash24x7 17.00 H/s 0W 0.00008492 0.5193 98% - ZergPool-Zero
CryptoDredge Allium 5.19 MH/s 0W 0.00008421 0.5150 97% 1.00% ZergPool-Garlic
Trex X17 9.35 MH/s 0W 0.00008076 0.4939 96% 1.00% BlockMasters
CryptoDredge Tribus 65.91 MH/s 0W 0.00007887 0.4823 95% 1.00% BlockMasters
EnemyZealot PHI 18.43 MH/s 0W 0.00006913 0.4227 95% 1.00% BlockMasters
XmrigNvidia CryptoNightHeavy 637.00 H/s 0W 0.00006564 0.4014 94% 1.00% NiceHash
CcminerKlaust Yescrypt 8.00 KH/s 0W 0.00006213 0.3799 99% - BlazePool
Bminer Equihash 426.00 H/s 0W 0.00006358 0.3888 93% 2.00% NiceHash
CcminerXevan Skein 415.50 MH/s 0W 0.00006123 0.3744 94% - BlockMasters
CcminerAlexis78 C11 12.55 MH/s 0W 0.00005820 0.3559 94% - BlockMasters
CcminerX16s HMQ1725 3.66 MH/s 0W 0.00005687 0.3478 94% - ZergPool
CcminerXevan Xevan 2.31 MH/s 0W 0.00005413 0.3310 97% - ZergPool
Excavator CryptoNightV7-NHMP 622.00 H/s 0W 0.00004914 0.3005 97% - NiceHash
EnemyZealot Timetravel 25.93 MH/s 0W 0.00005033 0.3078 91% 1.00% BlockMasters-Machinecoin
CcminerAlexis78x64 KeccakC 576.99 MH/s 0W 0.00004493 0.2747 65% - ZergPoolCoins-Creativecoin
CcminerKlaust YescryptR16 1.44 KH/s 0W 0.00003312 0.2025 96% - BlockMasters
CcminerSkunk Skunk 16.89 MH/s 0W 0.00002907 0.1778 96% - BlazePool
CcminerPolytimos Keccak 549.33 MH/s 0W 0.00001573 0.0962 93% - ZergPool-Maxcoin

[hernandn01]

followed instructions as I should on the first placed, and replace all files from Master. It is working now

[hernandn01]

working fine, currently redoing benchmarks where 1050 ti are involved. thank you very much

[RainbowMiner]

Super :)

[RainbowMiner]

@rinkal26783 : is your benchmark problem being resolved with the bugfix release, too?