typo

[rescience]

typo

[rougier]

Thanks. We're working on a (temporary) solution to allow PR on the wiki. See #9

[rougier]

I've setup the wiki repo at: https://github.com/ReScience/ReScience-wiki

[katyhuff]

gotcha. Though of course I have no authority here, I'd say @khinsen is right that a jekyll github site is more editable and potentially beautiful than the wiki solution in the longer term.

[rougier]

Totally agree. @ido posted in #9 what could be the solution (modulo website design).

[ctb]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:29:09AM -0700, Nicolas P. Rougier wrote:

Totally agree. @ido posted in #9 what could be the solution (modulo website design).

(pretty sure github pages does most of that without the added complexity
of Travis etc. etc. ReadThedocs also.)

[ido]

@ctb GitHub Pages don't get indexed by Google, Yahoo, etc. properly, and having a CI script and a droplet lets you do other things too, like run any apps you need, see previews, run tests, prevent changes to certain folders, etc. that you can't do with GH Pages. (There are other reasons, but I'm working on other things right now, if you read the link you'll see a few other reasons.) Also, regardless of which direction you take, rescience should exist on its own domain (CNAME feature in GH pages; DigitalOcean/AWS free tier/whatever + DNS)

[ctb]

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 11:21:12AM -0700, Ido Rosen wrote:

@ctb GitHub Pages don't get indexed by Google, Yahoo, etc. properly, and having a CI script and a droplet lets you do other things too, like run any apps you need, see previews, run tests, prevent changes to certain folders, etc. that you can't do with GH Pages. (There are other reasons, but I'm working on other things right now, if you read the link you'll see a few other reasons.) Also, regardless of which direction you take, rescience should exist on its own domain (CNAME feature in GH pages; DigitalOcean/AWS free tier/whatever + DNS)

OK - for an unfunded and new effort this is taking on a pretty sizable
maintenance burden, though!

[rougier]

Yes, maybe we can start simple (pelican / github pages) and see how things go.
Most urgent is to correct my terrible English...

[rougier]

Let's move this discussion to #9