Comments (35)
I think we're waiting for @vahtras review (gentle pressure :) )
from submissions.
Thanks for your (late) submission :) We'll assign an editor soon.
@pdebuyl Can you handle this submission (Physics/Python/Fortran) for the Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge (only # reviewer needed) ?
from submissions.
As editor thus?
from submissions.
@pdebuyl Yes, sorry, I should have explained.
from submissions.
ok
from submissions.
I mean, "I will edit" :-)
from submissions.
@jochym could you review the submission here? If this is your first review for ReScience, I will guide you through the process.
from submissions.
@dombrno could you review the submission here? If this is your first review for ReScience, I will guide you through the process.
from submissions.
@vahtras will review the paper. Thank you Olav!
from submissions.
ping @vahtras
from submissions.
@berquist would you review the submission "fermions at unitarity" for ReScience ? If this is your first review for ReScience, I will guide you through the process.
from submissions.
Is there a howto for reviewers @pdebuyl ?
from submissions.
Hi @vahtras
We have reviewer guidelines here: https://rescience.github.io/edit/
The most specific part of the review, in relation to ReScience, is to actually run the code and verify the claims of reproduction that are stated in the article.
Specifically for the ten-year challenge
- We only require one reviewer.
- The requirement to have a readable and reusable code are relaxed a bit. It would make little sense for the authors of this issue to perform a full modernization of their code.
- The author should provide in the article their reflection on the longevity, quality and retrievable character of their old code and of the corresponding environment (language, platform-specific code, proprietary tools, etc).
from submissions.
In this specific case, rerunning the full set of calculations might not be very practical, since it's going to require a non-negligible cpu time on a cluster.
Not sure what are implications though.
from submissions.
How many core-hours ? (or core-days / node-days depending on the hardware you have used)?
from submissions.
The largest runs in the supplement repository are some 120 CPU hours on 24 cores. Multiply it by about 1.5-2 for thermalization.
Smaller system sizes are much faster, some 4-10 cpu hours each, if a partial verification is OK. (rerun small system sizes on the reviewer's machine, rerun the fits with a mix of reviewer's data and my data or somesuch).
from submissions.
Well, this seems indeed costly. @vahtras do you have the resources for the small systems verification? (4-10 cpu hours each) ? I could execute that if necessary.
from submissions.
Hi all,
I see only now that the review process is frozen here. @vahtras what do you think of the computational requirements?
from submissions.
from submissions.
Hi @vahtras thank you for getting back to us :-) Other papers are still in the pipeline, so this should be ok.
from submissions.
Anything needed from me at this stage?
from submissions.
@vahtras do you still plan to review the article?
from submissions.
Yes, finally. First question: the makefile has been hardcoded for Intel compilers. Does it build with GNU?
from submissions.
It certainly does. ev-br/10yr_repro_challenge_35@837038f is the relevant makefile.
I then simply commented it out when transferring to cluster/intel compiler instead of adding platform detection (more brittle stuff to debug ten years down the line)
The change from gnu on a laptop to intel on cluster is here:
ev-br/10yr_repro_challenge_35@3603020
EDIT:the switch from gnu to intel is
ev-br/10yr_repro_challenge_35@acc2974
from submissions.
@pdebuyl Any progress?
from submissions.
Hi @rougier sorry about this. @vahtras is this still doable for you? In the meantime, I will try to find another reviewer.
from submissions.
from submissions.
@pdebuyl I think you need to find a new reviewer. You can use the @ ReScience/reviewers
notification if necessary.
from submissions.
@rougier I have started to do so.
from submissions.
Good. Any progress?
from submissions.
Yes, I have a candidate reviewer but am waiting for confirmation before putting it here.
from submissions.
Gentle reminder
from submissions.
Hi @rougier unfortunately I "lost" my candidate reviewer. In all fairness (and despite the already long delay), I'd prefer to wait mid-august to look again the mid-summer is a really bad time to find reviewers!
PS: I'll also consider reviewing the paper and have Konrad or someone else be editor (august as well I am not in office)
from submissions.
Ok. Note that according to our process, you can serve as 2nd reviewer while being the editor.
from submissions.
Any progress?
from submissions.
Related Issues (20)
- [Re] A Detailed Data-Driven Network Model of Prefrontal Cortex Reproduces Key Features of In Vivo Activity HOT 27
- [Re] Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos HOT 42
- [Re] Periodic forcing of a limit-cycle oscillator: fixed points, Arnold tongues, and the global organization of bifurcations HOT 15
- [¬Re] Setting Inventory Levels in a Bike Sharing Network HOT 18
- [Re] A circuit model of auditory cortex HOT 16
- [Re] Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networks HOT 32
- [Re] Predictive model for the size of bubbles and droplets created in microfluidic T-junctions HOT 15
- [Re] Inter-areal balanced amplification enhances signal propagation in a large-scale circuit model of the primate cortex HOT 67
- [Re] Exploration in Model-based Reinforcement Learning by Empirically Estimating Learning Progress HOT 42
- [Re] The Discriminative Kalman Filter for Bayesian Filtering with Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Observation Models HOT 17
- [Re] When Does Label Smoothing Help? HOT 12
- [Re] A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations HOT 28
- [Re] Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A new approach to self-supervised learning HOT 6
- [RE] MEDIRL Maximum Entropy Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Human Social Navigation HOT 3
- [Re] Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XL HOT 5
- [Re] Cortical network effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in a thalamo-cortical microcircuit model HOT 12
- POST-PROMD: an open-source POST-PROcessing software for Molecular Dynamics simulations HOT 3
- POST-PROMD: an open-source POST-PROcessing software for Molecular Dynamics simulations HOT 7
- [Re] Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten
- Replication Study on BiRT (Bio-inspired replay for transformers in Continual Learning)
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from submissions.