Current limitations document

[rethinkdb]

Current limitations document

[mlucy]

• Lack of automatic retrying for writes that might have version conflicts.
• Lack of atomic operations (even single-document ones).

[danielmewes]

• User records for "anonymous" users don't expire yet (though the users' JWT tokens do) and need to be removed from the users collection manually.
• While schema enforcement can be done through query templates and validator functions, there is no support for a declarative schema specification in the style of something like JSON Schema yet.

[mglukhovsky]

• Browsers and environment versions supported by the Horizon client

[chipotle]

This is a good idea for a document. @mlucy and @danielmewes are listing actual limitations, but @mglukhovsky is really offering a list of questions that I'll need answers to, though.

• GraphQL support, pagination, local user/password authentication: we don't have any of these, right?
• Browsers supported by the client: do we have a known minimum? Any browser that supports ES5 methods? (React simply lists: "React supports most popular browsers, including Internet Explorer 9 and above." Statements like that seem to be pretty common these days; the common wisdom appears to be that only people stuck with IE have to care about versions.)
• "Environment versions": This is a little nebulous; what environment?
• Reconnection logic: I presume this is about how an application reconnects to the Horizon server; there's an issue which has been open on that since November (rethinkdb/horizon#9), but I'm not sure what you need here as far as documenting it as a limitation, other than just mentioning that there is no auto

[danielmewes]

We talked about this a little bit yesterday, and it seems that the page really needs to cover two different things. One is "Limitations of current features" and the other is "Features that don't exist yet, but are planned".

GraphQL support, pagination, local user/password authentication: we don't have any of these, right?

Right, those would be "planned features".

Browsers supported by the client: do we have a known minimum?

I don't think we do, though there are some known issues with Internet Explorer 10 and 11 (see rethinkdb/horizon#566 ). We could say something along the lines of us not having tested compatibility with older browsers extensively yet, and mention the known incompatibility. @deontologician do you know more about which browsers should work?

Environment versions

I'm not entirely sure what @mglukhovsky had in mind here, though one thing that would fit into this point are supported versions of npm and node. I don't think this is something we need to mention on this page though, since we don't have any ambition to add support for older npm or node version. Another thing that might be worth mentioning on this page is that setting up a Horizon server on Windows is still not as well tested.

Reconnection logic

Yeah, this is another one of the missing features. No automatic reconnection logic, and also if you do reconnect manually, any active subscriptions will not (yet) automatically resume and will have to be set up again from scratch on the client.

[deontologician]

I am not sure which browsers should work. We know for certain it doesn't work on mobile safari, and it seems IE 10 based on @danielmewes testing. We have polyfills for the most bleeding edge stuff, but if your browser doesn't support Promises directly, you'll need to add your own polyfill