missing special field _db

[koos303]

missing special field _db

[rnewson]

Good point. It's currently missing. It existed before because all databases were indexed into the same Lucene index. Now that each view is a separate index, it's no longer needed.

[koos303]

Ok, I see the code in the older branches now, thanks. My use case is that I have two databases which contain two identical design documents, so the indexes are "shared" / have the same name.

I changed the toDocument() function in the RhinoDocument class to give back the database name, along with all the other fields. I don't know if this will work/hold for my prototype, I still could end up with separate indexes..

[edit]
This isn't going to work, because indexes now have a unique path name if i'm correct? So, back to the drawing board!

[rnewson]

the url for the query includes the database name, so including it in the index is redundant.

[koos303]

When using the 0.4 release i could get results back from another database, because the design documents had the same name. That's why i needed the _db field.

I now have one database for lucene searching, which is being filled by parsing the other databases. This works quite nicely and i don't have to patch anything