Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

Support for netstandard1.x about rollbar.net HOT 5 CLOSED

rollbar avatar rollbar commented on June 2, 2024
Support for netstandard1.x

from rollbar.net.

Comments (5)

akornich avatar akornich commented on June 2, 2024

Did you actually try moving your codebase from netstandard 1.x to 2.0? As I understand netstandard keeps growing a toolbox of its APIs from version to version, so normally, each newer version of the standard is a superset of previous ones. So, technically, there was nothing removed from APIs in 2.0 compare to 1.x. Hence, you should be able to move forward safely.

from rollbar.net.

luisrigoni avatar luisrigoni commented on June 2, 2024

The problem is that dependency (private and closed-sourced) is distributed as a Nuget package at MyGet and only to netstandard1.4. When I try updating my project to netstandard2.x the Package Manager fail saying it cannot be done because one dependency is not available to netstandard2.x.

from rollbar.net.

akornich avatar akornich commented on June 2, 2024

Strange, normally I would expect the PackageManager to still take 1.4 version and put out a warning but not a hard error. Is there possibility to request the component provider to target netstandard 2.0 side by side with 1.4 and build both into their NuGet package? It should be just a project file settings change and rebuild/repackage with no other actual source code changes.

from rollbar.net.

akornich avatar akornich commented on June 2, 2024

We do support similar multi-targeting of Rollbar.NET Notifier: netstandard2.0 and up, netcoreapp2.0 and up, net4.5 and up. netstandard1.x and netcoreapp1.x had very limited (not prime time ready in my opinion) functionality with lot of APIs missing (for example, some basic reflection and diagnostics types are missing). Adding support for <2.0 would mean adding conditional compilation control with source code branches of conditioning following significantly different designs and giving up on some features.

from rollbar.net.

luisrigoni avatar luisrigoni commented on June 2, 2024

Adding support for <2.0 would mean adding conditional compilation control with source code branches of conditioning following significantly different designs and giving up on some features.

Regarding any consideration, losing features don't seems reasonable and a good argument to not target netstandard1.x.

from rollbar.net.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.