Clarify License

[rtbhouse]

Clarify License

[DJRickyB]

yes please! would love to use/contribute if you're open to apache or similar. otherwise we can't use it here

[flowenol]

Hi, if GPLv3 doesn't suit you then we are willing to change to Apache. As a matter of fact, we intend to make the project as freely available as possible, of course without any liabilities.

[michaelandrepearce]

Apache license would be best if you wouldn't mind.

GPLv3 is too restrive unfortunatly, we wouldn't be able to use this as a dependency in a apache license project. https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html

[flowenol]

The license has been changed to Apache 2.0 upon your request.

[flowenol]

Properly licensed release will appear in a few days.

[flowenol]

Hi,

A properly licensed release is available since today, so I am closing this issue.

[michaelandrepearce]

@flowenol, FYI as im sure you'd like to know place where it is being used,

I am looking to contribute/commit this to the following project:
https://github.com/hortonworks/registry

Issue: hortonworks/registry#455,
PR: hortonworks/registry#456