Needs crypto_secretbox bindings

[rubycrypto]

Needs crypto_secretbox bindings

[namelessjon]

Also, whatever its called, its pretty easy to write. Most of the specs are the same as the Boxer class, since the 'KATs', such as they are, from libsodium/test uses the same key as derived from the example key pair.

[tarcieri]

I'd actually keep it SecretBox personally, and rename SecretKey to PrivateKey.

And you definitely deserve a commit bit man, thanks for all the awesome work you've been doing! 👍

[tarcieri]

You should now have commit access

[namelessjon]

Thanks!

I did originally have it as PrivateKey, but then all the docs for the library, and the constants, have it as 'secret key'. I'll switch it over. Also, I'm going to rename Boxer to Box I think. While it is, strictly, making crypto_boxes rather than being one, Boxer just sounds odd as a class.

[tarcieri]

Heh, I was just thinking about bringing that up as it were. +1 on Boxer => Box.

Also the nomenclature I prefer at least, some may disagree:

• symmetric crypto: secret key
• asymmetric crypto: public key / private key

[namelessjon]

Yeah, I prefer it that way too. Was just going for consistency with NaCl. At times, a hard task ...