autonetkit 0.9.0 unable to build any topology

[anubisg1]

autonetkit 0.9.0 unable to build any topology

[anubisg1]

if i build on top of the json example showed in the readme it still fails:

anubisg1@linux-uau6:~/netkit> autonetkit --debug -f home.json
INFO AutoNetkit 0.9.0
DEBUG Unable to load autonetkit_cisco No module named autonetkit_cisco
INFO Unable to connect to visualisation server http://127.0.0.1:8000/publish
ERROR Error generating network configurations: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'is_multigraph'. More information may be available in the debug log.
DEBUG Error generating network configurations
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/console_script.py", line 226, in main
build_options=build_options, grid=options.grid)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/console_script.py", line 50, in manage_network
anm = build_network.build(graph)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/ank_utils.py", line 11, in decorator
return fn(_args, *_kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/build_network.py", line 256, in build
anm = initialise(input_graph)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/ank_utils.py", line 11, in decorator
return fn(_args, *_kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/autonetkit/build_network.py", line 79, in initialise
all_multigraph = input_graph.is_multigraph()
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'is_multigraph'
Unable to build configurations.

[sk2]

Hi, is this the github version of ANK? if so, do you know which branch? There's a lot of code in flux for 0.9 at the moment - many core modules are being tidied up and extended.

[anubisg1]

hello,

i downloaded the "release" tarball. It's marked as 0.9.0 from here:
https://github.com/sk2/autonetkit/releases

and this is the commit referred to:

d22ceb0

[anubisg1]

it seems anyway, that running the latest git code does not have this problem :) i'm going to close this.

[sk2]

It's possible pulling the latest tagged version. I haven't tagged many since it's in such alpha state.

So it's quite possible the latest would be fine.

• Simon

Sent from a mobile device.

On 7 May 2014, at 6:55 pm, anubisg1 [email protected] wrote:

Closed #239.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.