Blargg's Game Boy tests: Instructions

[stewmath]

Blargg's Game Boy tests: Instructions

[Nebuleon]

-- Quote: Drenn, 2013-02-23, http://gbatemp.net/threads/gameyob-a-gameboy-emulator-for-ds.343407/page-3#post-4563539

I was able to fix a few problems with flags, but I don't know about instructions E8 and F8. I'd better take a look at Gambatte.

-- Quote: End

[Nebuleon]

I've looked into Gambatte. It appears the half-carry flag is bit 4 (overflowing from 0xF into 0x10), not 12 (overflowing from 0xFFF into 0x1000).

See this code:

#define sp_plus_n(sumout) do { \
    unsigned sp_plus_n_var_n; \
    PC_READ(sp_plus_n_var_n); \
    sp_plus_n_var_n = (sp_plus_n_var_n ^ 0x80) - 0x80; \
    \
    const unsigned sp_plus_n_var_sum = SP + sp_plus_n_var_n; \
    CF = SP ^ sp_plus_n_var_n ^ sp_plus_n_var_sum; \
    HF2 = CF << 5 & 0x200; /* this sets the half-carry flag to bit 4's value */ \
    ZF = 1; \
    cycleCounter += 4; \
    (sumout) = sp_plus_n_var_sum & 0xFFFF; \
} while (0)

[Stewmath]

I tried adapting this code, and it didn't really work. When I googled it I came up with this, blargg explaining to dwedit how E8 and F8 work. It has several differences, including that the negative and zero flags should be cleared. Also the carry flag is apparently based on the lower byte of SP added with the immediate value, considered unsigned. Maybe gambatte does this, I didn't really study all that XORing in detail. Gameyob passes the test now, but it's strange that those other differences exist since gambatte apparently passes the test too.