Feature request: verbose output

[supercilex]

Feature request: verbose output

[SUPERCILEX]

But I suppose I can just solve that by just wrapping cpz like

Yeah, I was going to say we could have cpz print the passed in args, but at that point why not just echo the args which is exactly what you did lol.

[SUPERCILEX]

This one gets a no because it requires locking across the copy threads again (either in user space or in the kernel). If you want to see the result, you can use tree on the destination after the copy. Also, if you can read the verbose output then it means you're copying so few files that it won't really matter what tool you use. cpz is only really interesting once you've made it past a few thousand files. :)

[baod-rate]

This one gets a no because it requires locking across the copy threads again

Yeah, totally fair. I realized the issue with cpz being multi-threaded after I wrote the issue

cpz is only really interesting once you've made it past a few thousand files

TBH, I'm mostly concerned with making sure my arguments are what I expected them to be. It's easy to lose your copies when you give cp/cpz a valid but unintentional path (like when I blast off the command with a few globs). But I suppose I can just solve that by just wrapping cpz like:

cpzv() {
  print -r ${(qq)@}
  cpz "$@"
}