Bundler

[swc-project]

Bundler

[TheLarkInn]

Maybe we can work to take the most time intensive pieces of existing bundlers and avoid overlapping work :) <3 webpack team :)

[TheLarkInn]

@kdy1 if you have intention to make a bundler, our team would be happy to share our learnings and design from webpack if you find it valuable. Feel free and reach out!!!!

[nick-at-hawkfish]

In my opinion, Rollup's plugin architecture and ease-of-use is much better than Webpack. I'd suggest using Rollup as inspiration on how to write a solid plugin system. See https://rollupjs.org/guide/en/#plugins-overview

[ForsakenHarmony]

yeah I'd say this should be more like webpack :^)

[anru]

@kdy1 btw, there is https://pax.js.org/ for that purpose

[kdy1]

@nick-at-hawkfish @wldcordeiro Thank you guys for opinions. I really need some, but it is very hard to hear from real users.

[wldcordeiro]

This could be a fun learning opportunity contributing for Rust. Thanks for the responsiveness. I'm testing this tool out with some projects and see lots of potential. 😄

[jrop]

@kdy1 You really should take @TheLarkInn up on his offer to share learnings 😄 He is on the Webpack core team, after all!

[kdy1]

@anru I were porting it, but I stuck at api design.

At now, I don't have a clear idea about plugin api.

[LuoZijun]

@kdy1

Note: The pax work with --es-syntax-everywhere option should be define process.env object.

px --es-syntax-everywhere in.js out.js

[kdy1]

I used (and tried) many build tools, but I doubt that there is a clear winner. So I want to hear various opinions about the bundlers.

I want to determine the plugin api. Interop with javascript from rust is a very hard task, so I want to write it once.

---

Can anyone here help me determining api related to the plugins? Any opinion is welcome.

I think important parts of plugin api are

• When to run

I'm considering something like a loader from webpack.

• What should a plugin responsible for

I have no idea.

[wldcordeiro]

In my opinion, Rollup's plugin architecture and ease-of-use is much better than Webpack. I'd suggest using Rollup as inspiration on how to write a solid plugin system. See https://rollupjs.org/guide/en/#plugins-overview

I like this suggestion as well! I do think the two serve slightly different usecases (basically libraries vs apps) primarily so perhaps building a tool that is able to work in the two modes maybe hard. I do find rollup to be an easier tool to configure and use though with its architecture so totally a better inspiration there!

[swc-bot]

This closed issue has been automatically locked because it had no new activity for a month. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you.