moving all packages to org.ta4j

[ta4j]

moving all packages to org.ta4j

[martinklepsch]

How about org.ta4j.core to avoid the name doubling?

…

On Sat, Sep 16, 2017, 20:04 Simon W, ***@***.***> wrote: I mean this repository under org.ta4j.ta4j and other possible repositories than under org.ta4j.other. Depending on the long term goals of this organization (that we have first to define) i could imagine starting some new once like org.ta4j.charting or org.ta4j.api ... — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF82AmfGhA7NyC8ny8k8wI4d18V4T2Kks5sjA2ugaJpZM4PZziJ> .

[team172011]

Yes, i think so, too. If we do so i would prefer org.ta4j.ta4j for this repository to keep open the possibility to create further repositories under this organization.

[dpalic]

have not got your point. you want to have all packages to start with

org.ta4j.ta4j

correct?
If so I would rather prefer something like

org.ta4j.lib

or similar. Maybe we find something more matching.
Wondering for your request. Are you planning to move your personal ta4j projects to this org?

[team172011]

I mean this repository under org.ta4j.ta4j and other possible repositories than under org.ta4j.other.
Depending on the long term goals of this organization (that we have first to define) i could imagine starting some new once like org.ta4j.charting or org.ta4j.api ...

[team172011]

Exactly that would be my suggestion!
But for the first the name of this repository should stay "ta4j" to avoid missunderstandings. Maybe we should establish the time frame of the "transitional period " from than on we start renaming and established our release process?

[dpalic]

org.ta4j.core

Sounds good!

I think we should deliver a transition release to move to the new api packages. And this release contains only this change. We should also post this on the README.md along with multiple more resources.

[team172011]

should we do this in release 0.10 or create an extra transition-release?

[dpalic]

I am not sure, but since we are a 0.x version I think we can risk the bad responses of the persons who have to modify their code.

We should definitively add this as a big note into the Changelog file!

[team172011]

finished in #52