Sorting memory usage by % is alphabetical not numerical (e.g. 5% is shown higher than 26%).

[gbb]

Sorting memory usage by % is alphabetical not numerical (e.g. 5% is shown higher than 26%).

[gbb]

Similarly, sorting disk usage by size pays no attention to:

numerical order
unit size.

So right now I have:

775G first
then tmpfs /tmp 676K
then tmpfs /tmp 676K (again? why?)
then 66GB
... and so on

[cyphar]

The reason for the unit size is that, rather than comparing each number by a set numerical value, they are compared by their string representation in human readable form. Just make df return the number of bytes, do the comparisons and sorting and then convert it to a human readable format.

[tariqbuilds]

I believe with PR #51 by @vernes , this is now addressed.

[gbb]

Using the current release as of today, it is not addressed unfortunately.

Currently my ordered list for disk usage runs:

1.8T
477M
16G

It appears terabytes are being placed in the wrong position. Affects multiple columns.

[gbb]

How do I reopen?

[vernes]

Ok, I'll look into it...

[commonquail]

Resolved.