[Feature Request] Separate Connections for Voyager and main tables

[thedevdojo]

[Feature Request] Separate Connections for Voyager and main tables

[vyuldashev]

@afsardo Administration Interface for current database

[vyuldashev]

@afsardo I think it would not be so hard. I can spend time and create pull request for this. It's just separating the entities. Voyager looks like Blog system with Admin interface right now, but not like Admin Interface.

[vyuldashev]

@afsardo Already started to work on. I also suggest to use PSR-2.

[marktopper]

My idea to get this to work is quite simply, to enable overwriting the models of Voyager, and then a user may add the protected $connection = 'voyager'; to the models they wish to separate from the application database.

[adriaanzon]

This would also make it easy to add a prefix to the table names (#64)

[vyuldashev]

@adriaanzon

Yeah, but may be I want Voyager be in one database and my main project in another. Even separate MySQL instances.

[afsardo]

But Voyager is an admin panel to manage your application if you have separate databases are you managing a different app? It needs access to your app data.

[vyuldashev]

@afsardo No I manage my own application. And I use micro-service architecture. So API, Web and other services are separated.

[afsardo]

So do you need Voyager for what? :X Sorry having a hard time understanding it.

[afsardo]

Hum what you mean is using Voyager with access to your app database, but all things db related voyager needs to work are stored in a diff db? I see..

I think that is a "whole" new product, one i am actually working on, generating a Backend for API.

Let's see the Maintainers opinion on it.

[afsardo]

Hum maybe you are right ;) Hope you do it! That would be an awesome addition and really powerful.

Any help or "lack of ideas" shoot me a message we can try and get a solution.

[afsardo]

Completely agree with you ;) In Sublime i have an auto format part of the build process, need to install it in Visual Code too.

[vyuldashev]

@afsardo what do you think about this:

 // This is for Voyager
 'mysql' => [
     'driver' => 'mysql',
     'host' => env('DB_HOST', 'localhost'),
     'port' => env('DB_PORT', '3306'),
     'database' => env('DB_DATABASE', 'forge'),
     'username' => env('DB_USERNAME', 'forge'),
     'password' => env('DB_PASSWORD', ''),
     'charset' => 'utf8',
     'collation' => 'utf8_unicode_ci',
     'prefix' => '',
     'strict' => true,
     'engine' => null,
 ],

 // This is for Entities aka Main database
 'main' => [
     'driver' => 'mysql',
     'host' => env('DB_MAIN_HOST', 'localhost'),
     'port' => env('DB_MAIN_PORT', '3306'),
     'database' => env('DB_MAIN_DATABASE', 'forge'),
     'username' => env('DB_MAIN_USERNAME', 'forge'),
     'password' => env('DB_MAIN_PASSWORD', ''),
     'charset' => 'utf8',
     'collation' => 'utf8_unicode_ci',
     'prefix' => '',
     'strict' => true,
     'engine' => null,
 ],

[afsardo]

I think it looks easy and clean ^^ Great Job!

[marktopper]

Are you still working on this @vladimir-yuldashev?

[marktopper]

Closing this since it will become possible to overwrite a Voyager model using in v0.11.

Then this can be done adding

protected $connection = 'voyager';

However, we have not yet figured out the best way to enable overwriting of the Voyager models. You can take a look at the discussion for this and let us know what solution you would prefer.

Reference #693

[fbuccioni]

I add this functionality in my repository and awaiting pull request #2175 if something need it.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. If you have further questions please ask in our Slack group.