You have no license

[tldr-pages]

You have no license

[waldyrious]

👍

[kenany]

Looks like BSD, but of course the full license text is required, especially since it is ambiguous as to whether it is BSD 2-clause or 3-clause at the moment.

[rprieto]

Thanks a good point, thanks. I was tempted to go BSD3 (code can be redistributed / downstream modifications allowed / no warranties or damage liabilities / name cannot be reused for derivatives or endorsements) but I don't have a deep knowledge of licenses, especially if it comes to mixing code & content. Does you have any recommendations?

[waldyrious]

I can't comment on the appropriateness of BSD2 vs. BSD3 (my personal choice would probably be BSD2), but just in case you're considering other (non-BSD) licensing choices, you might find this post which I came across the other day, potentially useful: I think offers a nice overview of the kind of projects where it makes sense to pick a permissive license as opposed to a copyleft license.

[zlatanvasovic]

Why not MIT? MIT is the most universan and the most readable license ever (I don't want you have all rights licenses).

[rprieto]

Fixed. Went with MIT which is very similar to BSD, but the permissions/restrictions definitely are easier to understand.

[zlatanvasovic]

Thanks.

2014-01-31 Romain Prieto [email protected]:

Fixed. Went with MIT http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT which is very
similar to BSD, but the permissions/restrictions definitely are easier to
understand.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/26#issuecomment-33755777
.

Zlatan Vasović - ZDroid