My concern about no classification by Procedural/Imperative and Functional programming Paradigm

[trekhleb]

My concern about no classification by Procedural/Imperative and Functional programming Paradigm

[ken-okabe]

Thanks for your response and the great project again @trekhleb .
As you suggest, the classification is another issue to be considered. It's often not easy.

An idea to classify things, especially these days, is not to "split" but to "tag" the algorithms.
One algorithm can be tagged as "#imperative #procedual #object-oriented", another can be "#functional #declarative #lazy-evaluation".　Tagging is a good method to express classifications that cross over.

Again, I really think it's not great especially for learners that we put algorithms for a certain target in the same box of mixed programming paradigms without any classifications.

[trekhleb]

Thank you for your suggestion @kenokabe.

Interesting implementation of factorial!

What programming paradigms do you mean? I mean how do you suggest to split algorithms in main README? Is it something from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programming_paradigm like imperative and declarative? Or more detailed like object-oriented, procedural and functional?

[trekhleb]

@kenokabe I like the idea with tagging! It may be one of the next enhancements to do here in this repo. Thank you for suggestion!

[georgebullock]

Is this going to happen? For a learning project, I think it would be valuable.