Improve the OE description as part of the registration for ACVP

[usnistgov]

Improve the OE description as part of the registration for ACVP

[hbooth]

The below is focused on just the part of registration that discussed what was in the OE originally. Note that a new top-sibling to the operationalEnvironment property has been created to describe the module, separately from the environment in which the module was being tested. We can discuss this further on the call, but just wanted to get this out there to start the discussion.

{
....
      "module": {
         "name": "Module Name",
         "version": "1.1",
         "type": "Software",
      },
      "operationalEnvironment": {
         "dependencies": [{
          "software": {
              "cpe": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux:3.1",
              "swid": "swid-tag"
          },
          "hardware": {
              "type": "processor",
              "name": "Intel Xeon Processor",
              "modelNumber": "LV 5148"
          }
      }]
    }
....
}

[hbooth]

From our phone discussion today:
"hardware": {
"type": "processor",
"manufacturer": "Intel"
"family": "ARK",
"name": "Xeon",
"series": "5100",
"features": ["feature1", "feature2"]
}

Additional Hardware attributes:
"family"
"architecture"
"core"
"instructionSet"
"microcode"

References for thought:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ARM_microarchitectures
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core
ISO-19770-2
NIST-IR 8060

[atvassilev]

Can this issue be closed now?

[celic]

Is there a reason this is still open?

[atvassilev]

No, I don't think so. At the time when I wrote previous comment, @hbooth's PR was still pending. Now that it is merged, this can be closed.