[enhancement] when do wep attack, airgeddon should only reports wep targets

[v1s1t0r1sh3r3]

[enhancement] when do wep attack, airgeddon should only reports wep targets

[v1s1t0r1sh3r3]

Done... this is already pushed on dev branch. It will be available on next 8.01 version and you can already test it downloading/clonning that branch. Closing...

You never saw faster development 🥇 😸 Contribute with a star on the project ⭐️

[v1s1t0r1sh3r3]

This was discussed time ago on some forum. The point is that a selected target can be used in other parts of the script too. So it's not filtered intentionally. Anyway, before launching a WEP attack, everything is validated.

The same behavior is happening when selecting a WPA/WPA2 for handshake capture... everything is shown.

Anyway, the changes to do this are very simple. We'll see what other users think about this.

[Giova84]

Maybe by adding another option in the menu, something like "do you wanna see only wep targets"?
However I noticed that airgeddon remebers the latest chosen target: when I launch a wps attack, I select a target: when I exit from the attack, I want to perform another attack on another target, but airgeddon relies on the latest target which I choosed, and will performs again the attach on such target: maybe would be also nice to add another option, (maybe displayed only if there is a previously choosed target) which asks if such target should be deleted; this could be achieved by saving the target in a temp text variable (eg: if last_target.txt contains some data, the option will be displayed; if the text file is empty, the option will not be displayed: bash scripts are able to make a lot of useful things :-)

[v1s1t0r1sh3r3]

Really? I think I know it 🙄

That's because "normal" target vars are shared over all menues excepting the wps menu. It has its own target vars. But this is not the point of this thread and I think is not important enough to open one for it.

Anyway, I already started development about this (filters on scannings).

[Giova84]

Yeah, I obviously knew that you know it :-) Was just to say "ok, I am aware of this", don't you worry :-)
Many thanks for your development 👍