How to handle tests that are indirectly covered by the test suite?

[w3c]

How to handle tests that are indirectly covered by the test suite?

[sspeiche]

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Samuel Padgett [email protected]
wrote:

The following requirements are covered by the test suite indirectly.
There are no tests referencing them, however, so they look like they're
missing in the coverage report. What's the best way to handle these?

Seems like we could just expand @SpecTest annotation to for something like
"indirectlyTests" and put a URL and SpecText there.

We could just have reporters generate them out as regular tests, maybe a
rdfs:seeAlso reference would be good. Keep it simple and not have to write
another test method but could see how this might mess up TestNG reporting.

[spadgett]

We also need to do something about the test we removed in #122. (Adding a comment here so we don't forget.)