Incorrect type for ref.func when function references are enabled

[14427]

Incorrect type for ref.func when function references are enabled

[keithw]

Thank you for testing this! As with #2097 and #1986 and #1987 and #2089, AFAIK support for the function-references proposal remains a work in progress in WABT. We don't even mention function references in the README, and we're not running the function-references tests. (I think function-references may have been folded into the "gc" proposal in the meantime, but not sure?)

I think somebody who is interested in pushing this forward will have to complete support for the function-references or gc proposals, and claim support in the README, and add the proposal spec tests to WABT's testsuite, before we'd expect function references to work properly. Closing as essentially a dup of #1377 . If you want to work on this, we'd be very happy to help / review contributions that get these proposals supported!