Undocumented and non-standardised default Content-Type application/warc-record

[webrecorder]

Undocumented and non-standardised default Content-Type application/warc-record

[ikreymer]

Not sure what would be a better option here.. It is a fallback if no other Content-Type is specified and/or its a non-standard record. application/warc-fields is for the warcinfo style fields, which this is not. and application/warc makes sense for the content-type for the WARC itself, but not for the payload of the record.. I suppose it could be application/octet-stream but that would imply that its binary.

[JustAnotherArchivist]

The Content-Type header is optional, so omitting it would be one option. application/octet-stream also seems sensible to me. WARC is a byte-oriented file format, so any payload must also be a collection of bytes. While the underlying data could be bit-based, it must be padded to bytes, which makes the container an octet-stream again. The WARC specification also mentions:

If the media type remains unknown, the reader should treat it as type “application/octet-stream”.

Personally, I think omitting the header would be the best option.