WithoutHeader fluent assertion

[jvmlet]

WithoutHeader fluent assertion

[jvmlet]

WithoutHeaderKey looks great, thanks a lot.

[StefH]

#1049

[StefH]

@jvmlet
Can you check the PR if this is what you need?

[StefH]

If you want, you can try preview version 1.5.46-ci-18207

[jvmlet]

Can you check the PR if this is what you need?

Thanks @StefH , would you please add WithoutHeader(string name), regardless the value ?

We integrated HeadersPropagation extension from MS and I want to make sure some headers don't leak to downstream services, no matter what the value is.

[CustomAssertion]
    public AndConstraint<WireMockAssertions> WithoutHeader(string expectedKey,  string because = "", params object[] becauseArgs)
        => WithoutHeader(expectedKey, Array.Empty<string>(), because, becauseArgs);

[StefH]

The problem is that I cannot keep that proposed method definition.
That because and becauseArgs will make the other existing WithoutHeader methods invalid.

So I can do:

public AndConstraint<WireMockAssertions> WithoutHeader(string unexpectedKey, (string Text, object[] Args)? because = null)

or / and

public AndConstraint<WireMockAssertions> WithoutHeaderKey(string unexpectedKey, string because = "", params object[] becauseArgs)