wincon: re-add HAVE_INFOEX

[wmcbrine]

wincon: re-add HAVE_INFOEX

[wmcbrine]

I disagree that the clutter is "minimal" and has "no bad part"; I find it ugly. It was a happy day for me when I thought I could take it out. (sigh)

I gotta admit, I was surprised to see the OSDN project you linked to. It doesn't show up in the first five pages of Google results for "mingw", and AFAICT, MinGW.org itself only points to SourceForge, where nothing has been updated since 2013; even the Wikipedia article on MinGW says "[t]he development of the original MinGW project has halted in 2013", although I now see that it does also link to OSDN.

[wmcbrine]

You know, looking at this again now, I think part of my opposition was that I'd planned to drop a lot more of the "ugly code" than I actually got around to doing. If it's just a matter of adding back this one structure... I might as well do it. I still feel like PDCurses shouldn't have to keep supporting outdated compile environments, but I seem to be outvoted. ;)

Rather than re-adding HAVE_INFOEX per se, I propose just HAVE_NO_INFOEX to bracket the structure. I'll accept the INFOEX=N from your Bill Gray patch as well.

[wmcbrine]

Changes posted now: 1cb6b51

(Not yet tested.)

[GitMensch]

Tested and works as expected:

• MINGW32 and MINGW64 build without any issues (demos only working in OS directly)
• MinGW builds with INFOEX=N (and demos working within MSYS and OS)

Thank you for coming back and finally solving this.