Change the syntax of named renderer

[zen0wu]

Change the syntax of named renderer

[wookayin]

Oops, I got a little mistake, the current syntax is not as above. I'll polish the issue later, sorry.

[zen0wu]

This is a good idea.
So the pipe behavior is like a sequential one right?
Like in ${X | Y | W} I have a "X", feed into "Y" and resulting "Z", then "Z" is further
fed into W instead of X?

How are you going to implement this?
The behaviour is built in into the template engine.

[wookayin]

Yeap, the lexer of jmte is hard-coded and seems to unconfigurable. What a pity :(
AFAIK There is no way to apply multiple renderers in chain -- unless we fork and customize it.

BTW, do we indeed need the chaining? And I wonder why contest category renderer (#77) is included in the string render. It is a parameterized thing, so what about split it into another renderer, as long as the other string filters are required for it. @vexorian please give your help and feedback for me. Thanks!

UPD1: I found a sample usage in 3e9b05b.

[zen0wu]

Yes, that actually is a good choice. We can split the contest render apart from the string. @vexorian What do you think?

[vexorian]

Sorry I didn't notice this before.

contest category renderer is included in string because lazyness.

I have been considering to make it whole renderer. It could also use more parameters too. Like separating TCO category by year.