[Question to the community] Removing `jasync` modules?

[guizmaii]

[Question to the community] Removing `jasync` modules?

[juliano]

@guizmaii both PRs for quill and protoquill updated

[guizmaii]

JAsync support as been dropped

[guizmaii]

@juliano I think we gave enough time to people to manifest themselves now. No one came here nor on Discord so I guess it's fair to consider that we can safely remove the JAsync support

[guizmaii]

I gave a last chance to people on Twitter/Discord. Let's merge them tomorrow morning if no one manifested him/herself

[gabfssilva]

I haven't been closely following the Scala world recently. However, my 2 cents: what about r2dbc support instead of jasync? r2dbc is a pretty mature API, it has some official drivers, and it also supports reactive streams. I'm not sure if the jdbc stream API matches the quality of r2dbc, but maybe with Loom support, it wouldn't matter anyway. Still, it'll work only on Java 21+.

[guizmaii]

what about r2dbc support instead of jasync?

Our goal here is not to find a replacement for jasync
Our goal is to simplify the life of the people making and maintaining Quill on their free time by removing unnecessary stuff from the Quill codebase