anna-hope / phonemes Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWJason Riggle's chart of phonological features in JSON format + extras
License: MIT License
Jason Riggle's chart of phonological features in JSON format + extras
License: MIT License
Currently, /ə/ (mid central unrounded vowel) collides with /ɛ/ (low-mid front unrounded vowel). I think there's a couple of things going on here:
there should probably be an explicit front
feature, so that the /ɛ/, /ɜ/, /ʌ/ trio would be +front, -back
, -front, -back
, -front, +back
. But the file doesn't currently have /ɜ/ anyway, and this seems like a bigger change.
as I read Riggle's chart, /ɘ/, /ə/, and /ɜ/ are distinguished in that /ɘ/ is +tense
, /ɜ/ is -tense
, and
/ə/ is neither:
(The file doesn't currently have /ɘ/ either, but again, bigger change.)
I propose making setting /ə/ to "tense": 0
, which will distinguish it from /ɛ/ and perhaps make it easier to add more vowels later.
/ɕ/ and /ʃʲ/ are both given as “voiceless alveolo-palatal sibilant” with the same features. From /ʃ/, it seems as though /ʃʲ/ should be “palatalized voiceless palato-alveolar sibilant”, although I admit I'm not sure how I'd hear (or produce) the difference. (/ʃ/ is also -strident
— maybe /ʃʲ/ should be as well?)
It looks like you're modeling palatalization as +dorsal, +high
, is that correct? This leads to a few pairs that can't be distinguished by features:
+dorsal
-strident
For (1), I'm not finding a good canonical explanation in distinctive feature terms of /d/ vs /ɾ/. I found some lecture notes from Michigan State that give /ɾ/ as +cont
, although I find that a little suspect. This undergraduate paper by Julianna Sarolta Pándi suggests it's a fool's errand and that none of the schemes the author's found are satisfactory, for various compelling reasons. (The +cont
analysis, for instance, might make sense analying the tap vs. trill contrast in Spanish but isn't much use when looking at the flapping of alveolar stops in American English).
For (2) and (3), it doesn't seem like as hopeless a cause, but I'm still not able to come up with a canonical answer. The distinction between /ɕ/ and /ç/ isn't clear in Jason Riggle's chart -- neither in place (alveolo-palatal vs. palatal) or manner (sibilant vs. non-sibilant). Olga Arnaudova has palatals as -coronal
, contra Riggle, and has palato-alveolars as +coronal
, but doesn't address the coronality of alveolo-palatals. (She has palato-alveolars as +strident
and alveolo-palatals as -strident
). She also doesn't address siblance. Daniel Recasens cites Ladefoged to the effect that “segments … are expected to be either coronal or dorsal, and the corresponding places of articulation alveolar or postalveolar if the segment is coronal and palatal if the segment is dorsal”. This would also suggest /ç/ should be -coronal
(cf. Arnaudova above). (Recasens, while arguing for IPA to incorporate a clear distinction between palatal and alveolopalatal, also says that /ɕ/ is “realized more often with a postalveolar articulation than with an alveolopalatal one.”) Maybe we should ask Riggle what he thinks.
So apart from the idea that /ʃʲ/ should be renamed and -strident
, I don't have any concrete suggestions. (I can submit a pull request for that if you agree.) Am I right in thinking /dʲ/–/ɾʲ/, /ç/–/ɕ/ and /ʝ/–/ʑ/ are more a matter of taste/convenience, and just more or less intractable in terms of features?
Likewisely the previously (sic), from what I gather from the PDF, /p b bʰ f v ɸ β/ shouldn’t be coronal.
From what I gather from the PDF, /z/ shouldn’t be dorsal, as /s/ also isn’t.
Thanks, btw :)
Awesome resource!
I think a useful annotation to add might be ARPABET encodings for each phoneme. I suspect a lot of people who are interested in a machine-readable format would also be using the CMU Dictionary and other ARPABET-encoded speech recognition software.
So
"t": {
"name": "voiceless alveolar stop",
"arpabet": "T"
"features": {...}
}
The phonological chart is no longer at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5956329/Riggle/PhonChart_v1212.pdf ; neither is there https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5956329/Riggle/_Riggle_CV.pdf anymore either :/
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.